Papers › Video-LLaVA: Learning United Visual Representation by Alignment Before Projection

Video-LLaVA: Learning United Visual Representation by Alignment Before Projection

16 Nov 2023arXiv:2311.10122archive 2025-07-28

Bin Lin, Yang Ye, Bin Zhu, Jiaxi Cui, Munan Ning, Peng Jin, Li Yuan

The Large Vision-Language Model (LVLM) has enhanced the performance of various downstream tasks in visual-language understanding. Most existing approaches encode images and videos into separate feature spaces, which are then fed as inputs to large language models. However, due to the lack of unified tokenization for images and videos, namely misalignment before projection, it becomes challenging for a Large Language Model (LLM) to learn multi-modal interactions from several poor projection layers. In this work, we unify visual representation into the language feature space to advance the foundational LLM towards a unified LVLM. As a result, we establish a simple but robust LVLM baseline, Video-LLaVA, which learns from a mixed dataset of images and videos, mutually enhancing each other. Video-LLaVA achieves superior performances on a broad range of 9 image benchmarks across 5 image question-answering datasets and 4 image benchmark toolkits. Additionally, our Video-LLaVA also outperforms Video-ChatGPT by 5.8%, 9.9%, 18.6%, and 10.1% on MSRVTT, MSVD, TGIF, and ActivityNet, respectively. Notably, extensive experiments demonstrate that Video-LLaVA mutually benefits images and videos within a unified visual representation, outperforming models designed specifically for images or videos. We aim for this work to provide modest insights into the multi-modal inputs for the LLM. Code address: \href{https://github.com/PKU-YuanGroup/Video-LLaVA}

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2311.10122")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 7 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 3 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 6 samples from 2 repositories, 4 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

PKU-YuanGroup/Video-LLaVA officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report
PKU-YuanGroup/LLMBind mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
pku-yuangroup/languagebind mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
pku-yuangroup/video-bench mentioned on GitHub report
qiujihao19/artemis mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

7 samples harvested; 4 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
3ran
3unverified

Licence: 1 of the 7 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_depth_transform pku-yuangroup/languagebind/languagebind/depth/processing_depth.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · ac6a026c5d4ff47b · report
int16_to_float32_torch pku-yuangroup/languagebind/languagebind/audio/processing_audio.py community (archive-listed) ran · honoured contract fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 20a58a8c04ccda43 · report
opencv_loader pku-yuangroup/languagebind/languagebind/depth/processing_depth.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · 5530423121ac4757 · report
stack_dict pku-yuangroup/languagebind/model/languagebind.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · 833effea5806a36e · report
LlavaMetaForCausalLM PKU-YuanGroup/LLMBind/model/llava/model/llava_arch.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3d9df14425d0ebcf · report
make_list_of_images pku-yuangroup/languagebind/languagebind/audio/processing_audio.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 852e87ab903330a7 · report
build_video_tower identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 6d6b281af73773f5 · report

Tasks

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelMultiple-choiceQuestion AnsweringTemporal Relation ExtractionVideo Question AnsweringVisual Question AnsweringVisual Question Answering (VQA)Zero-Shot Video Question Answer

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Temporal Relation Extraction Vinoground Video-LLaVA-7B Group Score 6.6 #15 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Temporal Relation Extraction Vinoground Video-LLaVA-7B Text Score 24.8 #15 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Temporal Relation Extraction Vinoground Video-LLaVA-7B Video Score 25.8 #15 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Video Question Answering ActivityNet-QA Video-LLaVA Accuracy 45.3 #16 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Video Question Answering ActivityNet-QA Video-LLaVA Confidence score 3.3 #16 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering MM-Vet Video-LLaVA GPT-4 score 32.0 #187 of 231 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer ActivityNet-QA Video-LLaVA Accuracy 45.3 #22 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer ActivityNet-QA Video-LLaVA Confidence Score 3.3 #22 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer MSRVTT-QA Video-LLaVA-7B Accuracy 59.2 #17 of 30 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer MSRVTT-QA Video-LLaVA-7B Confidence Score 3.5 #17 of 30 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer MSVD-QA Video-LLaVA-7B Accuracy 70.7 #17 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer MSVD-QA Video-LLaVA-7B Confidence Score 3.9 #17 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer TGIF-QA Video-LLaVA-7B Accuracy 70.0 #9 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer TGIF-QA Video-LLaVA-7B Confidence Score 4.0 #9 of 14 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections