Papers › GPT4RoI: Instruction Tuning Large Language Model on Region-of-Interest

GPT4RoI: Instruction Tuning Large Language Model on Region-of-Interest

7 Jul 2023arXiv:2307.03601archive 2025-07-28

Shilong Zhang, Peize Sun, Shoufa Chen, Min Xiao, Wenqi Shao, Wenwei Zhang, Yu Liu, Kai Chen, Ping Luo

Visual instruction tuning large language model(LLM) on image-text pairs has achieved general-purpose vision-language abilities. However, the lack of region-text pairs limits their advancements to fine-grained multimodal understanding. In this paper, we propose spatial instruction tuning, which introduces the reference to the region-of-interest(RoI) in the instruction. Before sending to LLM, the reference is replaced by RoI features and interleaved with language embeddings as a sequence. Our model GPT4RoI, trained on 7 region-text pair datasets, brings an unprecedented interactive and conversational experience compared to previous image-level models. (1) Interaction beyond language: Users can interact with our model by both language and drawing bounding boxes to flexibly adjust the referring granularity. (2) Versatile multimodal abilities: A variety of attribute information within each RoI can be mined by GPT4RoI, e.g., color, shape, material, action, etc. Furthermore, it can reason about multiple RoIs based on common sense. On the Visual Commonsense Reasoning(VCR) dataset, GPT4RoI achieves a remarkable accuracy of 81.6%, surpassing all existing models by a significant margin (the second place is 75.6%) and almost reaching human-level performance of 85.0%. The code, dataset, and demo can be found at https://github.com/jshilong/GPT4RoI.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2307.03601")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 5 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 4 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran; community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

jshilong/gpt4roi officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchNOASSERTION report
qiujihao19/artemis mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
sunsmarterjie/chatterbox mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

3ran
2unverified

Licence: 5 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

align_tensor jshilong/gpt4roi/gpt4roi/models/layers.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · af6df62850536230 · report
coordinate_to_encoding jshilong/gpt4roi/gpt4roi/models/layers.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 77950a821bd7955f · report
str2spi jshilong/gpt4roi/gpt4roi/models/layers.py official repository ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 79307b0c7bfc9b57 · report
add_spatial_token jshilong/gpt4roi/gpt4roi/models/spi_llava.py official repository unverified licence not identified · pointer only · d1f9aed426aa655d · report
build_conv_layer qiujihao19/artemis/mmcv-1.4.7/mmcv/cnn/bricks/conv.py community (archive-listed) unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 5a7f2911d6b8e15c · report

Tasks

AttributeCommon Sense ReasoningLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelVisual Commonsense ReasoningVisual Question AnsweringVisual Question Answering (VQA)

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Visual Question Answering ViP-Bench GPT4ROI 7B (ROI) GPT-4 score (bbox) 35.1 #11 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering (VQA) VCR (Q-A) test GPT4RoI Accuracy 89.4 #1 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering (VQA) VCR (Q-AR) test GPT4RoI Accuracy 81.6 #1 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering (VQA) VCR (QA-R) test GPT4RoI Accuracy 91.0 #1 of 8 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections