Papers › UPANets: Learning from the Universal Pixel Attention Networks
UPANets: Learning from the Universal Pixel Attention Networks
Ching-Hsun Tseng, Shin-Jye Lee, Jia-Nan Feng, Shengzhong Mao, Yu-Ping Wu, Jia-Yu Shang, Mou-Chung Tseng, Xiao-jun Zeng
Among image classification, skip and densely-connection-based networks have dominated most leaderboards. Recently, from the successful development of multi-head attention in natural language processing, it is sure that now is a time of either using a Transformer-like model or hybrid CNNs with attention. However, the former need a tremendous resource to train, and the latter is in the perfect balance in this direction. In this work, to make CNNs handle global and local information, we proposed UPANets, which equips channel-wise attention with a hybrid skip-densely-connection structure. Also, the extreme-connection structure makes UPANets robust with a smoother loss landscape. In experiments, UPANets surpassed most well-known and widely-used SOTAs with an accuracy of 96.47% in Cifar-10, 80.29% in Cifar-100, and 67.67% in Tiny Imagenet. Most importantly, these performances have high parameters efficiency and only trained in one customer-based GPU. We share implementing code of UPANets in https://github.com/hanktseng131415go/UPANets.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | UPANets | Percentage correct | 96.47 | #110 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | UPANets | Percentage correct | 80.29 | #130 of 211 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Tiny ImageNet Classification | UPANets | Validation Acc | 67.67 | #19 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Tiny-ImageNet | UPANets | Top 1 Accuracy | 67.67 | #1 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections