Papers › Deep One-Class Classification via Interpolated Gaussian Descriptor

Deep One-Class Classification via Interpolated Gaussian Descriptor

25 Jan 2021arXiv:2101.10043archive 2025-07-28

Yuanhong Chen, Yu Tian, Guansong Pang, Gustavo Carneiro

One-class classification (OCC) aims to learn an effective data description to enclose all normal training samples and detect anomalies based on the deviation from the data description. Current state-of-the-art OCC models learn a compact normality description by hyper-sphere minimisation, but they often suffer from overfitting the training data, especially when the training set is small or contaminated with anomalous samples. To address this issue, we introduce the interpolated Gaussian descriptor (IGD) method, a novel OCC model that learns a one-class Gaussian anomaly classifier trained with adversarially interpolated training samples. The Gaussian anomaly classifier differentiates the training samples based on their distance to the Gaussian centre and the standard deviation of these distances, offering the model a discriminability w.r.t. the given samples during training. The adversarial interpolation is enforced to consistently learn a smooth Gaussian descriptor, even when the training data is small or contaminated with anomalous samples. This enables our model to learn the data description based on the representative normal samples rather than fringe or anomalous samples, resulting in significantly improved normality description. In extensive experiments on diverse popular benchmarks, including MNIST, Fashion MNIST, CIFAR10, MVTec AD and two medical datasets, IGD achieves better detection accuracy than current state-of-the-art models. IGD also shows better robustness in problems with small or contaminated training sets. Code is available at https://github.com/tianyu0207/IGD.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2101.10043")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

tianyu0207/IGD officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · fixture could not drive it

Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from tianyu0207/IGD. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

extract_patch tianyu0207/IGD/multi_scale/inference_det.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 31ec545afe73c07e · report

Tasks

Anomaly DetectionClassificationOne-Class ClassificationUnsupervised Anomaly Detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Anomaly Detection Fashion-MNIST IGD (pre-trained SSL) ROC AUC 94.41 #4 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection Fashion-MNIST IGD (pre-trained ImageNet) ROC AUC 93.57 #5 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection Fashion-MNIST IGD (scratch) ROC AUC 92.01 #9 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection Hyper-Kvasir Dataset IGD AUC 0.939 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection LAG IGD AUC 0.796 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection MNIST IGD (pre-trained ImageNet) ROC AUC 99.27 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection MNIST IGD (scratch) ROC AUC 98.69 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection MVTec AD IGD (pre-trained SSL) Detection AUROC 93.4 #99 of 148 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection MVTec AD IGD (pre-trained SSL) Segmentation AUROC 93.0 #99 of 148 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection MVTec AD IGD Detection AUROC 93.4 #100 of 148 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection MVTec AD IGD (pre-trained ImageNet) Detection AUROC 92.6 #105 of 148 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection MVTec AD IGD (pre-trained ImageNet) Segmentation AUROC 91 #105 of 148 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection One-class CIFAR-10 IGD (pre-trained SSL) AUROC 91.25 #17 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection One-class CIFAR-10 IGD (pre-trained ImageNet) AUROC 83.68 #26 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection One-class CIFAR-10 IGD (scratch) AUROC 74.33 #28 of 36 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections