Papers › UniRepLKNet: A Universal Perception Large-Kernel ConvNet for Audio, Video, Point...

UniRepLKNet: A Universal Perception Large-Kernel ConvNet for Audio, Video, Point Cloud, Time-Series and Image Recognition

27 Nov 2023arXiv:2311.15599archive 2025-07-28

Xiaohan Ding, Yiyuan Zhang, Yixiao Ge, Sijie Zhao, Lin Song, Xiangyu Yue, Ying Shan

Large-kernel convolutional neural networks (ConvNets) have recently received extensive research attention, but two unresolved and critical issues demand further investigation. 1) The architectures of existing large-kernel ConvNets largely follow the design principles of conventional ConvNets or transformers, while the architectural design for large-kernel ConvNets remains under-addressed. 2) As transformers have dominated multiple modalities, it remains to be investigated whether ConvNets also have a strong universal perception ability in domains beyond vision. In this paper, we contribute from two aspects. 1) We propose four architectural guidelines for designing large-kernel ConvNets, the core of which is to exploit the essential characteristics of large kernels that distinguish them from small kernels - they can see wide without going deep. Following such guidelines, our proposed large-kernel ConvNet shows leading performance in image recognition (ImageNet accuracy of 88.0%, ADE20K mIoU of 55.6%, and COCO box AP of 56.4%), demonstrating better performance and higher speed than the recent powerful competitors. 2) We discover large kernels are the key to unlocking the exceptional performance of ConvNets in domains where they were originally not proficient. With certain modality-related preprocessing approaches, the proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance on time-series forecasting and audio recognition tasks even without modality-specific customization to the architecture. All the code and models are publicly available on GitHub and Huggingface.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2311.15599")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 2 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 2 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

ailab-cvc/unireplknet officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
Westlake-AI/openmixup mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
chenller/mmseg-extension mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

2 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
1unverified

Licence: 0 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from ailab-cvc/unireplknet. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_bn ailab-cvc/unireplknet/unireplknet.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 9a2e756528f23042 · report
fuse_bn ailab-cvc/unireplknet/unireplknet.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 5a70ce114f24b052 · report

Tasks

Image ClassificationObject DetectionSemantic SegmentationTime SeriesTime Series Forecasting

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Classification ImageNet UniRepLKNet-XL++ Top 1 Accuracy 88% #63 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet UniRepLKNet-L++ Top 1 Accuracy 87.9% #67 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet UniRepLKNet-B++ Top 1 Accuracy 87.4% #91 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet UniRepLKNet-S++ Top 1 Accuracy 86.4% #145 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet UniRepLKNet-S Top 1 Accuracy 83.9% #374 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet UniRepLKNet-T Top 1 Accuracy 83.2% #449 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet UniRepLKNet-N Top 1 Accuracy 81.6% #622 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet UniRepLKNet-P Top 1 Accuracy 80.2% #712 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet UniRepLKNet-F Top 1 Accuracy 78.6% #818 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet UniRepLKNet-A Top 1 Accuracy 77% #891 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO 2017 UniRepLKNet-XL++ mAP 56.4 #8 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO 2017 UniRepLKNet-L++ mAP 55.8 #9 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO 2017 UniRepLKNet-B++ mAP 54.8 #10 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO 2017 UniRepLKNet-S++ mAP 54.3 #11 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO 2017 UniRepLKNet-S mAP 53 #13 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO 2017 UniRepLKNet-T mAP 51.7 #15 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K UniRepLKNet-XL Validation mIoU 55.6 #46 of 235 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K UniRepLKNet-L++ Validation mIoU 55 #52 of 235 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K UniRepLKNet-B++ Validation mIoU 53.9 #72 of 235 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K UniRepLKNet-S++ Validation mIoU 52.7 #88 of 235 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K UniRepLKNet-S Validation mIoU 51 #105 of 235 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K UniRepLKNet-T Validation mIoU 49.1 #138 of 235 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

SPEED

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections