Papers › TaskDrop: A Competitive Baseline for Continual Learning of Sentiment Classification
TaskDrop: A Competitive Baseline for Continual Learning of Sentiment Classification
JianPing Mei, Yilun Zheng, Qianwei Zhou, Rui Yan
In this paper, we study the multi-task sentiment classification problem in the continual learning setting, i.e., a model is sequentially trained to classifier the sentiment of reviews of products in a particular category. The use of common sentiment words in reviews of different product categories leads to large cross-task similarity, which differentiates it from continual learning in other domains. This knowledge sharing nature renders forgetting reduction focused approaches less effective for the problem under consideration. Unlike existing approaches, where task-specific masks are learned with specifically presumed training objectives, we propose an approach called Task-aware Dropout (TaskDrop) to generate masks in a random way. While the standard dropout generates and applies random masks for each training instance per epoch for effective regularization, TaskDrop applies random masking for task-wise capacity allocation and reuse. We conducted experimental studies on three multi-task review datasets and made comparison to various baselines and state-of-the-art approaches. Our empirical results show that regardless of simplicity, TaskDrop overall achieved competitive performances for all the three datasets, especially after relative long term learning. This demonstrates that the proposed random capacity allocation mechanism works well for continual sentiment classification.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections