Papers › Structural Scaffolds for Citation Intent Classification in Scientific Publications

Structural Scaffolds for Citation Intent Classification in Scientific Publications

2 Apr 2019NAACL 2019 6arXiv:1904.01608archive 2025-07-28

Arman Cohan, Waleed Ammar, Madeleine van Zuylen, Field Cady

Identifying the intent of a citation in scientific papers (e.g., background information, use of methods, comparing results) is critical for machine reading of individual publications and automated analysis of the scientific literature. We propose structural scaffolds, a multitask model to incorporate structural information of scientific papers into citations for effective classification of citation intents. Our model achieves a new state-of-the-art on an existing ACL anthology dataset (ACL-ARC) with a 13.3% absolute increase in F1 score, without relying on external linguistic resources or hand-engineered features as done in existing methods. In addition, we introduce a new dataset of citation intents (SciCite) which is more than five times larger and covers multiple scientific domains compared with existing datasets. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/allenai/scicite.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1904.01608")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 5 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 5 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

allenai/scicite officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

5unverified

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from allenai/scicite. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

format_classification_report allenai/scicite/scicite/helper.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 38de940cb5880659 · report
get_values_from_list allenai/scicite/scicite/compute_features.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · f6dc9b8239d238b8 · report
is_in_lexicon allenai/scicite/scicite/compute_features.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 2ee438c5e132ba51 · report
partial_fmeasure_multilabel allenai/scicite/scicite/helper.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · b6bccabb0e613e32 · report
read_jurgens_jsonline allenai/scicite/scicite/data.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 7c5400088745676b · report

Tasks

ARCCitation Intent ClassificationClassificationGeneral ClassificationIntent ClassificationReading ComprehensionSentence Classificationintent-classification

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

SciCite

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Citation Intent Classification ACL-ARC Structural-scaffolds Macro-F1 67.9 #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Citation Intent Classification SciCite Structural-Scaffolds Macro-F1 84.99 #7 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentence Classification ACL-ARC Structural-scaffolds F1 67.9 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Sentence Classification SciCite Structural-scaffolds F1 84 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections