Papers › Stable Cluster Discrimination for Deep Clustering

Stable Cluster Discrimination for Deep Clustering

24 Nov 2023ICCV 2023 1arXiv:2311.14310archive 2025-07-28

Qi Qian

Deep clustering can optimize representations of instances (i.e., representation learning) and explore the inherent data distribution (i.e., clustering) simultaneously, which demonstrates a superior performance over conventional clustering methods with given features. However, the coupled objective implies a trivial solution that all instances collapse to the uniform features. To tackle the challenge, a two-stage training strategy is developed for decoupling, where it introduces an additional pre-training stage for representation learning and then fine-tunes the obtained model for clustering. Meanwhile, one-stage methods are developed mainly for representation learning rather than clustering, where various constraints for cluster assignments are designed to avoid collapsing explicitly. Despite the success of these methods, an appropriate learning objective tailored for deep clustering has not been investigated sufficiently. In this work, we first show that the prevalent discrimination task in supervised learning is unstable for one-stage clustering due to the lack of ground-truth labels and positive instances for certain clusters in each mini-batch. To mitigate the issue, a novel stable cluster discrimination (SeCu) task is proposed and a new hardness-aware clustering criterion can be obtained accordingly. Moreover, a global entropy constraint for cluster assignments is studied with efficient optimization. Extensive experiments are conducted on benchmark data sets and ImageNet. SeCu achieves state-of-the-art performance on all of them, which demonstrates the effectiveness of one-stage deep clustering. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/idstcv/SeCu}.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2311.14310")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

idstcv/secu officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran

Licence: 0 of the 1 sample are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from idstcv/secu. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

SeCu idstcv/secu/secu/builder.py official repository ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 8eb4fb46021c1901 · report

Tasks

ClusteringDeep ClusteringImage ClusteringRepresentation LearningUnsupervised Image Classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Clustering CIFAR-10 SeCu ARI 0.857 #7 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering CIFAR-10 SeCu Accuracy 0.93 #7 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering CIFAR-10 SeCu Backbone ResNet-18 #7 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering CIFAR-10 SeCu NMI 0.861 #7 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering CIFAR-10 SeCu Train set Train #7 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet SeCu ARI 41.9 #9 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet SeCu Accuracy 53.5 #9 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet SeCu NMI 79.4 #9 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet CoKe ARI 35.6 #10 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet CoKe Accuracy 47.6 #10 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet CoKe NMI 76.2 #10 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering STL-10 SeCu ARI 0.693 #12 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering STL-10 SeCu Accuracy 0.836 #12 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering STL-10 SeCu Backbone ResNet-18 #12 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering STL-10 SeCu NMI 0.733 #12 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering STL-10 SeCu Train Split Train #12 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Unsupervised Image Classification CIFAR-10 SeCu Accuracy 93 #2 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Unsupervised Image Classification CIFAR-20 SeCu Accuracy 55.2 #8 of 14 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections