Papers › Squeezing Backbone Feature Distributions to the Max for Efficient Few-Shot Learning

Squeezing Backbone Feature Distributions to the Max for Efficient Few-Shot Learning

18 Oct 2021arXiv:2110.09446archive 2025-07-28

Yuqing Hu, Vincent Gripon, Stéphane Pateux

Few-shot classification is a challenging problem due to the uncertainty caused by using few labelled samples. In the past few years, many methods have been proposed with the common aim of transferring knowledge acquired on a previously solved task, what is often achieved by using a pretrained feature extractor. Following this vein, in this paper we propose a novel transfer-based method which aims at processing the feature vectors so that they become closer to Gaussian-like distributions, resulting in increased accuracy. In the case of transductive few-shot learning where unlabelled test samples are available during training, we also introduce an optimal-transport inspired algorithm to boost even further the achieved performance. Using standardized vision benchmarks, we show the ability of the proposed methodology to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy with various datasets, backbone architectures and few-shot settings.

PaperPDFCode

Code

yhu01/bms officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Few-Shot Image ClassificationFew-Shot Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Few-Shot Image Classification CIFAR-FS 5-way (1-shot) PEMnE-BMS* Accuracy 88.44 #3 of 38 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification CIFAR-FS 5-way (5-shot) PEMnE-BMS* Accuracy 91.86 #5 of 39 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification CUB 200 5-way 1-shot PEMnE-BMS* Accuracy 94.78 #5 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification CUB 200 5-way 5-shot PEMnE-BMS* Accuracy 96.43 #4 of 32 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-ImageNet-CUB 5-way (1-shot) PEMnE-BMS* Accuracy 63.90 #2 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-ImageNet-CUB 5-way (5-shot) PEMnE-BMS Accuracy 79.15 #2 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-Imagenet 5-way (1-shot) PEMnE-BMS* (transductive) Accuracy 85.54 #7 of 105 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-Imagenet 5-way (1-shot) PEMbE-NCM (inductive) Accuracy 68.43 #38 of 105 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-Imagenet 5-way (5-shot) PEMnE-BMS*(transductive) Accuracy 91.53 #6 of 95 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-Imagenet 5-way (5-shot) PEMbE-NCM (inductive) Accuracy 84.67 #26 of 95 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Tiered ImageNet 5-way (1-shot) PEMnE-BMS* Accuracy 86.07 #3 of 49 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Tiered ImageNet 5-way (5-shot) PEMnE-BMS* Accuracy 91.09 #4 of 51 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Test

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections