Papers › SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text

SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text

16 Jun 2016EMNLP 2016 11arXiv:1606.05250archive 2025-07-28

Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, Percy Liang

We present the Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD), a new reading comprehension dataset consisting of 100,000+ questions posed by crowdworkers on a set of Wikipedia articles, where the answer to each question is a segment of text from the corresponding reading passage. We analyze the dataset to understand the types of reasoning required to answer the questions, leaning heavily on dependency and constituency trees. We build a strong logistic regression model, which achieves an F1 score of 51.0%, a significant improvement over a simple baseline (20%). However, human performance (86.8%) is much higher, indicating that the dataset presents a good challenge problem for future research. The dataset is freely available at https://stanford-qa.com

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1606.05250")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 6 code samples harvested from 0 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · violated contract; 2 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: 6 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

21 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.

BAJUKA/SQuAD-NLP mentioned on GitHubtf report
GauthierDmn/question_answering mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
GauthierDmn/question_generation mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
HKUST-KnowComp/R-Net mentioned on GitHubtf report
Tao-Mind/QDD_Net mentioned on GitHubtfMIT report
ZhangShiyue/QGforQA mentioned on GitHubtfMIT report
chia-hsuan-lee/spoken-squad mentioned on GitHubNOASSERTION report
chiahsuan156/Spoken-SQuAD mentioned on GitHubNOASSERTION report
chrisc36/debias mentioned on GitHubtfApache-2.0 report
dangwalp/qg mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
jiho-yesnlp/qytl mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
leozhoujf/DataSciComp mentioned on GitHubpaddle report
lmn-extracts/dcn_plus mentioned on GitHubtf report
mivg/sled mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
rsvp-ai/bertserini mentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report
stonybrooknlp/musique mentioned on GitHub report
trisongz/question-answering-lightning mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
ymcui/Chinese-ELECTRA mentioned on GitHubtfApache-2.0 report
yuriak/PPDAI mentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 4 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
1ran · violated contract
2ran · our draft was wrong
2unverified

Licence: 6 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

data_from_json identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong licence of this copy not recorded · 40b9eb36720710bb · report
exact_match_score identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · violated contract fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · f6c275d6a18330a9 · report
f1_score identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · honoured contract fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · 2112c433b9c6d343 · report
normalize_answer identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · c6a80c065d2e4851 · report
maybe_download identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 4839200676aaf471 · report
reporthook identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 9724d0da37841e48 · report

Tasks

ArticlesQuestion AnsweringReading Comprehensionregression

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections