Papers › Specificity-preserving RGB-D Saliency Detection
Specificity-preserving RGB-D Saliency Detection
Tao Zhou, Deng-Ping Fan, Geng Chen, Yi Zhou, Huazhu Fu
Salient object detection (SOD) on RGB and depth images has attracted more and more research interests, due to its effectiveness and the fact that depth cues can now be conveniently captured. Existing RGB-D SOD models usually adopt different fusion strategies to learn a shared representation from the two modalities (\ie, RGB and depth), while few methods explicitly consider how to preserve modality-specific characteristics. In this study, we propose a novel framework, termed SPNet} (Specificity-preserving network), which benefits SOD performance by exploring both the shared information and modality-specific properties (\eg, specificity). Specifically, we propose to adopt two modality-specific networks and a shared learning network to generate individual and shared saliency prediction maps, respectively. To effectively fuse cross-modal features in the shared learning network, we propose a cross-enhanced integration module (CIM) and then propagate the fused feature to the next layer for integrating cross-level information. Moreover, to capture rich complementary multi-modal information for boosting the SOD performance, we propose a multi-modal feature aggregation (MFA) module to integrate the modality-specific features from each individual decoder into the shared decoder. By using a skip connection, the hierarchical features between the encoder and decoder layers can be fully combined. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our~\ours~outperforms cutting-edge approaches on six popular RGB-D SOD and three camouflaged object detection benchmarks. The project is publicly available at: https://github.com/taozh2017/SPNet.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2108.08162")
Code
Syntology Ran 8 of 14 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 6 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 8 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 14 samples from 1 repository, 8 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
14 samples harvested; 8 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 14 of the 14 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from taozh2017/spnet. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
6f7dc36dfca30bd6 · report
3ffcd486629f4a44 · report
cdd815c11bc3b308 · report
44339066f845642e · report
d0645ef0d981f8c6 · report
64042638243b2287 · report
ed2cc280674cf0a0 · report
1ba84e986e6271da · report
80cb9358c3e49eba · report
0f30b631d3500cde · report
a6795e469d7d38d1 · report
f87d1c0232c5537b · report
e53b02bcbaa59003 · report
6ed15a5516f3109e · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Detection | DSEC | SPNet | mAP | 27.7 | #5 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | PKU-DDD17-Car | SPNet | mAP50 | 84.7 | #2 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Thermal Image Segmentation | RGB-T-Glass-Segmentation | SPNet | MAE | 0.041 | #6 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections