Papers › SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognition
SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognition
Daniel S. Park, William Chan, Yu Zhang, Chung-Cheng Chiu, Barret Zoph, Ekin D. Cubuk, Quoc V. Le
We present SpecAugment, a simple data augmentation method for speech recognition. SpecAugment is applied directly to the feature inputs of a neural network (i.e., filter bank coefficients). The augmentation policy consists of warping the features, masking blocks of frequency channels, and masking blocks of time steps. We apply SpecAugment on Listen, Attend and Spell networks for end-to-end speech recognition tasks. We achieve state-of-the-art performance on the LibriSpeech 960h and Swichboard 300h tasks, outperforming all prior work. On LibriSpeech, we achieve 6.8% WER on test-other without the use of a language model, and 5.8% WER with shallow fusion with a language model. This compares to the previous state-of-the-art hybrid system of 7.5% WER. For Switchboard, we achieve 7.2%/14.6% on the Switchboard/CallHome portion of the Hub5'00 test set without the use of a language model, and 6.8%/14.1% with shallow fusion, which compares to the previous state-of-the-art hybrid system at 8.3%/17.3% WER.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1904.08779")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 18 code samples harvested from 6 repositories linked to this paper; 17 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 18 samples from 6 repositories, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
30 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
18 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 17 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 18 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 6 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
aabacfe520817be6 · report
8365bd2bebaeee71 · report
a67846a111580cfb · report
5c640f85e661f5c9 · report
b8b1c17d15f3c463 · report
3046ea943ba309f2 · report
0c8faeedf5a5c01a · report
aa9757e8039b3c4a · report
ba904be9deeb14d4 · report
2046b512475f2561 · report
be893d0ee5559ea0 · report
7fd389e1e9203afa · report
aa191294fe80e2d4 · report
ff652f83fe897b32 · report
ed8e1a9c22ce7ac6 · report
649daef969b655ed · report
fdad4c356de2036b · report
d94ba36bc01eda60 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speech Recognition | Hub5'00 SwitchBoard | LAS + SpecAugment (with LM, Switchboard mild policy) | CallHome | 14.6 | #1 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | Hub5'00 SwitchBoard | LAS + SpecAugment (with LM, Switchboard mild policy) | SwitchBoard | 6.8 | #1 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | Hub5'00 SwitchBoard | LAS + SpecAugment (with LM, Switchboard strong policy) | CallHome | 14 | #2 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | Hub5'00 SwitchBoard | LAS + SpecAugment (with LM, Switchboard strong policy) | SwitchBoard | 7.1 | #2 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | LibriSpeech test-clean | LAS + SpecAugment | Word Error Rate (WER) | 2.5 | #39 of 64 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | LibriSpeech test-clean | LAS (no LM) | Word Error Rate (WER) | 2.7 | #42 of 64 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | LibriSpeech test-other | LAS + SpecAugment | Word Error Rate (WER) | 5.8 | #36 of 53 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | LibriSpeech test-other | LAS (no LM) | Word Error Rate (WER) | 6.5 | #39 of 53 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections