Papers › SILC: Improving Vision Language Pretraining with Self-Distillation
SILC: Improving Vision Language Pretraining with Self-Distillation
Muhammad Ferjad Naeem, Yongqin Xian, Xiaohua Zhai, Lukas Hoyer, Luc van Gool, Federico Tombari
Image-Text pretraining on web-scale image caption datasets has become the default recipe for open vocabulary classification and retrieval models thanks to the success of CLIP and its variants. Several works have also used CLIP features for dense prediction tasks and have shown the emergence of open-set abilities. However, the contrastive objective used by these models only focuses on image-text alignment and does not incentivise image feature learning for dense prediction tasks. In this work, we introduce SILC, a novel framework for vision language pretraining. SILC improves image-text contrastive learning with the simple addition of local-to-global correspondence learning by self-distillation. We show that distilling local image features from an exponential moving average (EMA) teacher model significantly improves model performance on dense predictions tasks like detection and segmentation, while also providing improvements on image-level tasks such as classification and retrieval. SILC models sets a new state of the art for zero-shot classification, few shot classification, image and text retrieval, zero-shot segmentation, and open vocabulary segmentation. We further show that SILC features greatly benefit open vocabulary detection, captioning and visual question answering.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation | ADE20K-150 | SILC | mIoU | 37.7 | #5 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation | ADE20K-847 | SILC | mIoU | 15.0 | #7 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL Context-459 | SILC | mIoU | 25.8 | #1 of 15 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL Context-59 | SILC | mIoU | 63.5 | #2 of 24 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation | PascalVOC-20 | SILC | mIoU | 97.6 | #2 of 20 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation | PascalVOC-20b | SILC | mIoU | 82.5 | #3 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections