Papers › Sharpness-aware Quantization for Deep Neural Networks

Sharpness-aware Quantization for Deep Neural Networks

24 Nov 2021arXiv:2111.12273archive 2025-07-28

Jing Liu, Jianfei Cai, Bohan Zhuang

Network quantization is a dominant paradigm of model compression. However, the abrupt changes in quantized weights during training often lead to severe loss fluctuations and result in a sharp loss landscape, making the gradients unstable and thus degrading the performance. Recently, Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) has been proposed to smooth the loss landscape and improve the generalization performance of the models. Nevertheless, directly applying SAM to the quantized models can lead to perturbation mismatch or diminishment issues, resulting in suboptimal performance. In this paper, we propose a novel method, dubbed Sharpness-Aware Quantization (SAQ), to explore the effect of SAM in model compression, particularly quantization for the first time. Specifically, we first provide a unified view of quantization and SAM by treating them as introducing quantization noises and adversarial perturbations to the model weights, respectively. According to whether the noise and perturbation terms depend on each other, SAQ can be formulated into three cases, which are analyzed and compared comprehensively. Furthermore, by introducing an efficient training strategy, SAQ only incurs a little additional training overhead compared with the default optimizer (e.g., SGD or AdamW). Extensive experiments on both convolutional neural networks and Transformers across various datasets (i.e., ImageNet, CIFAR-10/100, Oxford Flowers-102, Oxford-IIIT Pets) show that SAQ improves the generalization performance of the quantized models, yielding the SOTA results in uniform quantization. For example, on ImageNet, SAQ outperforms AdamW by 1.2% on the Top-1 accuracy for 4-bit ViT-B/16. Our 4-bit ResNet-50 surpasses the previous SOTA method by 0.9% on the Top-1 accuracy.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 11 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from zhuang-group/saq. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections