Papers › Sentence Alignment with Parallel Documents Facilitates Biomedical Machine Translation
Sentence Alignment with Parallel Documents Facilitates Biomedical Machine Translation
Shengxuan Luo, Huaiyuan Ying, Jiao Li, Sheng Yu
Objective: Today's neural machine translation (NMT) can achieve near human-level translation quality and greatly facilitates international communications, but the lack of parallel corpora poses a key problem to the development of translation systems for highly specialized domains, such as biomedicine. This work presents an unsupervised algorithm for deriving parallel corpora from document-level translations by using sentence alignment and explores how training materials affect the performance of biomedical NMT systems. Materials and Methods: Document-level translations are mixed to train bilingual word embeddings (BWEs) for the evaluation of cross-lingual word similarity, and sentence distance is defined by combining semantic and positional similarities of the sentences. The alignment of sentences is formulated as an extended earth mover's distance problem. A Chinese-English biomedical parallel corpus is derived with the proposed algorithm using bilingual articles from UpToDate and translations of PubMed abstracts, which is then used for the training and evaluation of NMT. Results: On two manually aligned translation datasets, the proposed algorithm achieved accurate sentence alignment in the 1-to-1 cases and outperformed competing algorithms in the many-to-many cases. The NMT model fine-tuned on biomedical data significantly improved the in-domain translation quality (zh-en: +17.72 BLEU; en-zh: +17.02 BLEU). Both the size of the training data and the combination of different corpora can significantly affect the model's performance. Conclusion: The proposed algorithm relaxes the assumption for sentence alignment and effectively generates accurate translation pairs that facilitate training high quality biomedical NMT models.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2104.08588")
Code
Syntology Ran 2 of 2 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: official repository: 2 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
2 samples harvested; 2 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from luosx18/biomedical-sentence-aligner. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
cf6aef763287fdb8 · report
9b929b741d2df87a · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections