Papers › Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era
Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era
Chen Sun, Abhinav Shrivastava, Saurabh Singh, Abhinav Gupta
The success of deep learning in vision can be attributed to: (a) models with high capacity; (b) increased computational power; and (c) availability of large-scale labeled data. Since 2012, there have been significant advances in representation capabilities of the models and computational capabilities of GPUs. But the size of the biggest dataset has surprisingly remained constant. What will happen if we increase the dataset size by 10x or 100x? This paper takes a step towards clearing the clouds of mystery surrounding the relationship between `enormous data' and visual deep learning. By exploiting the JFT-300M dataset which has more than 375M noisy labels for 300M images, we investigate how the performance of current vision tasks would change if this data was used for representation learning. Our paper delivers some surprising (and some expected) findings. First, we find that the performance on vision tasks increases logarithmically based on volume of training data size. Second, we show that representation learning (or pre-training) still holds a lot of promise. One can improve performance on many vision tasks by just training a better base model. Finally, as expected, we present new state-of-the-art results for different vision tasks including image classification, object detection, semantic segmentation and human pose estimation. Our sincere hope is that this inspires vision community to not undervalue the data and develop collective efforts in building larger datasets.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ResNet-101 (JFT-300M Finetuning) | Top 1 Accuracy | 79.2% | #769 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO test-dev | Faster R-CNN (ImageNet+300M) | AP50 | 58 | #219 of 225 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO test-dev | Faster R-CNN (ImageNet+300M) | AP75 | 40.1 | #219 of 225 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO test-dev | Faster R-CNN (ImageNet+300M) | APL | 51.2 | #219 of 225 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO test-dev | Faster R-CNN (ImageNet+300M) | APM | 41.1 | #219 of 225 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO test-dev | Faster R-CNN (ImageNet+300M) | APS | 17.5 | #219 of 225 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO test-dev | Faster R-CNN (ImageNet+300M) | box mAP | 37.4 | #219 of 225 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Pose Estimation | COCO test-dev | Faster R-CNN (ImageNet+300M) | AP | 64.4 | #39 of 47 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Pose Estimation | COCO test-dev | Faster R-CNN (ImageNet+300M) | AP50 | 85.7 | #39 of 47 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Pose Estimation | COCO test-dev | Faster R-CNN (ImageNet+300M) | AP75 | 70.7 | #39 of 47 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Pose Estimation | COCO test-dev | Faster R-CNN (ImageNet+300M) | APL | 69.8 | #39 of 47 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Pose Estimation | COCO test-dev | Faster R-CNN (ImageNet+300M) | APM | 61.8 | #39 of 47 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2007 | DeepLabv3 (ImageNet+300M) | Mean IoU | 81.3 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 val | DeepLabv3 (ImageNet+300M) | mIoU | 76.5% | #19 of 29 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections