Papers › Relation Classification with Entity Type Restriction
Relation Classification with Entity Type Restriction
Shengfei Lyu, Huanhuan Chen
Relation classification aims to predict a relation between two entities in a sentence. The existing methods regard all relations as the candidate relations for the two entities in a sentence. These methods neglect the restrictions on candidate relations by entity types, which leads to some inappropriate relations being candidate relations. In this paper, we propose a novel paradigm, RElation Classification with ENtity Type restriction (RECENT), which exploits entity types to restrict candidate relations. Specially, the mutual restrictions of relations and entity types are formalized and introduced into relation classification. Besides, the proposed paradigm, RECENT, is model-agnostic. Based on two representative models GCN and SpanBERT respectively, RECENT_GCN and RECENT_SpanBERT are trained in RECENT. Experimental results on a standard dataset indicate that RECENT improves the performance of GCN and SpanBERT by 6.9 and 4.4 F1 points, respectively. Especially, RECENT_SpanBERT achieves a new state-of-the-art on TACRED.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relation Extraction | TACRED | RECENT+SpanBERT | F1 | 75.2 | #6 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections