Papers › Positional Prompt Tuning for Efficient 3D Representation Learning
Positional Prompt Tuning for Efficient 3D Representation Learning
Shaochen Zhang, Zekun Qi, Runpei Dong, Xiuxiu Bai, Xing Wei
Point cloud analysis has achieved significant development and is well-performed in multiple downstream tasks like point cloud classification and segmentation, etc. Being conscious of the simplicity of the position encoding structure in Transformer-based architectures, we attach importance to the position encoding as a high-dimensional part and the patch encoder to offer multi-scale information. Together with the sequential Transformer, the whole module with position encoding comprehensively constructs a multi-scale feature abstraction module that considers both the local parts from the patch and the global parts from center points as position encoding. With only a few parameters, the position embedding module fits the setting of PEFT (Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning) tasks pretty well. Thus we unfreeze these parameters as a fine-tuning part. At the same time, we review the existing prompt and adapter tuning methods, proposing a fresh way of prompts and synthesizing them with adapters as dynamic adjustments. Our Proposed method of PEFT tasks, namely PPT, with only 1.05% of parameters for training, gets state-of-the-art results in several mainstream datasets, such as 95.01% accuracy in the ScanObjectNN OBJ_BG dataset. Codes will be released at https://github.com/zsc000722/PPT.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D Point Cloud Classification | ModelNet40 | PointMAE+PPT | Overall Accuracy | 93.88 | #38 of 111 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| 3D Point Cloud Classification | ScanObjectNN | ReCon+PPT | OBJ-BG (OA) | 95.01 | #23 of 77 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| 3D Point Cloud Classification | ScanObjectNN | ReCon+PPT | OBJ-ONLY (OA) | 93.28 | #23 of 77 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| 3D Point Cloud Classification | ScanObjectNN | ReCon+PPT | Overall Accuracy | 89.52 | #23 of 77 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections