Papers › Placing M-Phasis on the Plurality of Hate: A Feature-Based Corpus of Hate Online

Placing M-Phasis on the Plurality of Hate: A Feature-Based Corpus of Hate Online

28 Apr 2022LREC 2022 6arXiv:2204.13400archive 2025-07-28

Dana Ruiter, Liane Reiners, Ashwin Geet D'Sa, Thomas Kleinbauer, Dominique Fohr, Irina Illina, Dietrich Klakow, Christian Schemer, Angeliki Monnier

Even though hate speech (HS) online has been an important object of research in the last decade, most HS-related corpora over-simplify the phenomenon of hate by attempting to label user comments as "hate" or "neutral". This ignores the complex and subjective nature of HS, which limits the real-life applicability of classifiers trained on these corpora. In this study, we present the M-Phasis corpus, a corpus of ~9k German and French user comments collected from migration-related news articles. It goes beyond the "hate"-"neutral" dichotomy and is instead annotated with 23 features, which in combination become descriptors of various types of speech, ranging from critical comments to implicit and explicit expressions of hate. The annotations are performed by 4 native speakers per language and achieve high (0.77 <= k <= 1) inter-annotator agreements. Besides describing the corpus creation and presenting insights from a content, error and domain analysis, we explore its data characteristics by training several classification baselines.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

Code

uds-lsv/mphasis officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ArticlesHate Speech Detection

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

M-Phasis

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections