Papers › Panoptic Segmentation with a Joint Semantic and Instance Segmentation Network
Panoptic Segmentation with a Joint Semantic and Instance Segmentation Network
Daan de Geus, Panagiotis Meletis, Gijs Dubbelman
We present a single network method for panoptic segmentation. This method combines the predictions from a jointly trained semantic and instance segmentation network using heuristics. Joint training is the first step towards an end-to-end panoptic segmentation network and is faster and more memory efficient than training and predicting with two networks, as done in previous work. The architecture consists of a ResNet-50 feature extractor shared by the semantic segmentation and instance segmentation branch. For instance segmentation, a Mask R-CNN type of architecture is used, while the semantic segmentation branch is augmented with a Pyramid Pooling Module. Results for this method are submitted to the COCO and Mapillary Joint Recognition Challenge 2018. Our approach achieves a PQ score of 17.6 on the Mapillary Vistas validation set and 27.2 on the COCO test-dev set.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panoptic Segmentation | COCO test-dev | JSIS-Net | PQ | 27.2 | #38 of 38 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Panoptic Segmentation | COCO test-dev | JSIS-Net | PQst | 23.4 | #38 of 38 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Panoptic Segmentation | COCO test-dev | JSIS-Net | PQth | 29.6 | #38 of 38 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Panoptic Segmentation | Mapillary val | JSIS-Net (ResNet-50) | PQ | 17.6 | #11 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections