Papers › OVM, Outcome-supervised Value Models for Planning in Mathematical Reasoning

OVM, Outcome-supervised Value Models for Planning in Mathematical Reasoning

16 Nov 2023arXiv:2311.09724archive 2025-07-28

Fei Yu, Anningzhe Gao, Benyou Wang

Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with maintaining accuracy throughout multiple multiple reasoning steps, especially in mathematical reasoning where an error in earlier steps can propagate to subsequent ones and it ultimately leading to an incorrect answer. To reduce error propagation, guided decoding is employed to direct the LM decoding on a step-by-step basis. We argue that in guided decoding, assessing the potential of an incomplete reasoning path can be more advantageous than simply ensuring per-step correctness, as the former approach leads towards a correct final answer. This transforms the task into a value estimation problem in planning. Inspired by the findings that outcome supervision for guided decoding essentially acts as a value model, we propose Outcome-supervised Value Model (OVM) that employs outcome supervision for training a value model, which prioritizes steps that lead to accurate conclusions. Furthermore, the OVM eliminates the need for labor-intensive annotations of step-level correctness, thereby significantly enhancing its scalability. Our experiments on two multi-step mathematical reasoning datasets, GSM8K and Game of 24, demonstrate the superior performance of the OVM model. Notably, in GSM8K, our OVM-7B model achieves state-of-the-art results among LLMs up to 13B parameters; especially it does not utilize GPT-4 or code execution. These findings offer a novel perspective on the role of outcome supervision in training value models for multi-step reasoning tasks and provide theoretical justification for its advantage in value estimation for guided decoding.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2311.09724")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it.

By repository: official repository: 3 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

freedomintelligence/ovm officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
2ran · fixture could not drive it

Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from freedomintelligence/ovm. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

find_leftmost_notpadded_positions freedomintelligence/ovm/utils/sampling.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 8fdef88472c55f5f · report
find_leftmost_tokens_positions freedomintelligence/ovm/utils/sampling.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 28575a54407bbb1b · report
find_rightmost_tokens_positions freedomintelligence/ovm/utils/sampling.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 8c5bf5cfdc4cf894 · report

Tasks

Arithmetic ReasoningGSM8KMathematical Reasoning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Arithmetic Reasoning GSM8K OVM-Mistral-7B (verify100@1) Accuracy 84.7 #47 of 164 Archive leaderboard report
Arithmetic Reasoning GSM8K OVM-Mistral-7B (verify100@1) Parameters (Billion) 7 #47 of 164 Archive leaderboard report
Arithmetic Reasoning GSM8K OVM-Mistral-7B (verify20@1) Accuracy 82.6 #56 of 164 Archive leaderboard report
Arithmetic Reasoning GSM8K OVM-Mistral-7B (verify20@1) Parameters (Billion) 7 #56 of 164 Archive leaderboard report
Arithmetic Reasoning GSM8K OVM-Llama2-7B (verify100@1) Accuracy 73.7 #95 of 164 Archive leaderboard report
Arithmetic Reasoning GSM8K OVM-Llama2-7B (verify100@1) Parameters (Billion) 7 #95 of 164 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

AdamWLLaMA

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections