Papers › Open-YOLO 3D: Towards Fast and Accurate Open-Vocabulary 3D Instance Segmentation
Open-YOLO 3D: Towards Fast and Accurate Open-Vocabulary 3D Instance Segmentation
Mohamed El Amine Boudjoghra, Angela Dai, Jean Lahoud, Hisham Cholakkal, Rao Muhammad Anwer, Salman Khan, Fahad Shahbaz Khan
Recent works on open-vocabulary 3D instance segmentation show strong promise, but at the cost of slow inference speed and high computation requirements. This high computation cost is typically due to their heavy reliance on 3D clip features, which require computationally expensive 2D foundation models like Segment Anything (SAM) and CLIP for multi-view aggregation into 3D. As a consequence, this hampers their applicability in many real-world applications that require both fast and accurate predictions. To this end, we propose a fast yet accurate open-vocabulary 3D instance segmentation approach, named Open-YOLO 3D, that effectively leverages only 2D object detection from multi-view RGB images for open-vocabulary 3D instance segmentation. We address this task by generating class-agnostic 3D masks for objects in the scene and associating them with text prompts. We observe that the projection of class-agnostic 3D point cloud instances already holds instance information; thus, using SAM might only result in redundancy that unnecessarily increases the inference time. We empirically find that a better performance of matching text prompts to 3D masks can be achieved in a faster fashion with a 2D object detector. We validate our Open-YOLO 3D on two benchmarks, ScanNet200 and Replica, under two scenarios: (i) with ground truth masks, where labels are required for given object proposals, and (ii) with class-agnostic 3D proposals generated from a 3D proposal network. Our Open-YOLO 3D achieves state-of-the-art performance on both datasets while obtaining up to ∼16× speedup compared to the best existing method in literature. On ScanNet200 val. set, our Open-YOLO 3D achieves mean average precision (mAP) of 24.7% while operating at 22 seconds per scene. Code and model are available at github.com/aminebdj/OpenYOLO3D.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2406.02548")
Code
Syntology Ran 4 of 11 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 11 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
11 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 11 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from aminebdj/openyolo3d. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
a2c0b7667d1bb3f5 · report
9fd328d58844f055 · report
d77ef48746ee7ff1 · report
945af43d6054ff01 · report
e2d190ab0e997db4 · report
d9c5945898e9b307 · report
8860634b31a744dc · report
2f0819a20a8970d4 · report
e47cf090e9fda5a8 · report
42c8e07d575c5757 · report
be96878cd262fb03 · report
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D Open-Vocabulary Instance Segmentation | Replica | Open-YOLO 3D | mAP | 23.7 | #1 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| 3D Open-Vocabulary Instance Segmentation | ScanNet200 | Open-YOLO 3D | AP Common | 24.3 | #2 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| 3D Open-Vocabulary Instance Segmentation | ScanNet200 | Open-YOLO 3D | AP Head | 27.8 | #2 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| 3D Open-Vocabulary Instance Segmentation | ScanNet200 | Open-YOLO 3D | AP Tail | 21.6 | #2 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| 3D Open-Vocabulary Instance Segmentation | ScanNet200 | Open-YOLO 3D | AP25 | 36.2 | #2 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| 3D Open-Vocabulary Instance Segmentation | ScanNet200 | Open-YOLO 3D | AP50 | 31.7 | #2 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| 3D Open-Vocabulary Instance Segmentation | ScanNet200 | Open-YOLO 3D | mAP | 24.7 | #2 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections