Papers › Open-world Learning and Application to Product Classification

Open-world Learning and Application to Product Classification

17 Sep 2018arXiv:1809.06004archive 2025-07-28

Hu Xu, Bing Liu, Lei Shu, P. Yu

Classic supervised learning makes the closed-world assumption, meaning that classes seen in testing must have been seen in training. However, in the dynamic world, new or unseen class examples may appear constantly. A model working in such an environment must be able to reject unseen classes (not seen or used in training). If enough data is collected for the unseen classes, the system should incrementally learn to accept/classify them. This learning paradigm is called open-world learning (OWL). Existing OWL methods all need some form of re-training to accept or include the new classes in the overall model. In this paper, we propose a meta-learning approach to the problem. Its key novelty is that it only needs to train a meta-classifier, which can then continually accept new classes when they have enough labeled data for the meta-classifier to use, and also detect/reject future unseen classes. No re-training of the meta-classifier or a new overall classifier covering all old and new classes is needed. In testing, the method only uses the examples of the seen classes (including the newly added classes) on-the-fly for classification and rejection. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the new approach.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ClassificationGeneral ClassificationMeta-Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections