Papers › Open Intent Discovery through Unsupervised Semantic Clustering and Dependency Parsing
Open Intent Discovery through Unsupervised Semantic Clustering and Dependency Parsing
PengFei Liu, Youzhang Ning, King Keung Wu, Kun Li, Helen Meng
Intent understanding plays an important role in dialog systems, and is typically formulated as a supervised learning problem. However, it is challenging and time-consuming to design the intents for a new domain from scratch, which usually requires a lot of manual effort of domain experts. This paper presents an unsupervised two-stage approach to discover intents and generate meaningful intent labels automatically from a collection of unlabeled utterances in a domain. In the first stage, we aim to generate a set of semantically coherent clusters where the utterances within each cluster convey the same intent. We obtain the utterance representation from various pre-trained sentence embeddings and present a metric of balanced score to determine the optimal number of clusters in K-means clustering for balanced datasets. In the second stage, the objective is to generate an intent label automatically for each cluster. We extract the ACTION-OBJECT pair from each utterance using a dependency parser and take the most frequent pair within each cluster, e.g., book-restaurant, as the generated intent label. We empirically show that the proposed unsupervised approach can generate meaningful intent labels automatically and achieve high precision and recall in utterance clustering and intent discovery.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections