Papers › On Generalization in Coreference Resolution

On Generalization in Coreference Resolution

20 Sep 2021CRAC (ACL) 2021 11arXiv:2109.09667archive 2025-07-28

Shubham Toshniwal, Patrick Xia, Sam Wiseman, Karen Livescu, Kevin Gimpel

While coreference resolution is defined independently of dataset domain, most models for performing coreference resolution do not transfer well to unseen domains. We consolidate a set of 8 coreference resolution datasets targeting different domains to evaluate the off-the-shelf performance of models. We then mix three datasets for training; even though their domain, annotation guidelines, and metadata differ, we propose a method for jointly training a single model on this heterogeneous data mixture by using data augmentation to account for annotation differences and sampling to balance the data quantities. We find that in a zero-shot setting, models trained on a single dataset transfer poorly while joint training yields improved overall performance, leading to better generalization in coreference resolution models. This work contributes a new benchmark for robust coreference resolution and multiple new state-of-the-art results.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

shtoshni92/fast-coref officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
shtoshni/fast-coref mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Coreference ResolutionData Augmentationcoreference-resolution

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Coreference Resolution LitBank longdoc S (OntoNotes + PreCo + LitBank) F1 78.2 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Coreference Resolution OntoNotes longdoc S (OntoNotes + 60k pseudo-singletons) F1 80.6 #8 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Coreference Resolution OntoNotes longdoc S (ON + PreCo + LitBank + 30k pseudo-singletons) F1 79.6 #13 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Coreference Resolution OntoNotes longdoc S (OntoNotes + PreCo + LitBank) F1 79.2 #14 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Coreference Resolution PreCo longdoc S (OntoNotes + PreCo + LitBank) F1 87.6 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Coreference Resolution Quizbowl longdoc S (OntoNotes + PreCo + LitBank) F1 42.9 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Coreference Resolution WikiCoref longdoc S (ON + PreCo + LitBank + 30k pseudo-singletons) F1 62.5 #2 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Coreference Resolution WikiCoref longdoc S (OntoNotes + PreCo + LitBank) F1 60.3 #3 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Coreference Resolution Winograd Schema Challenge longdoc S (OntoNotes + PreCo + LitBank) Accuracy 60.1 #58 of 82 Archive leaderboard report
Coreference Resolution Winograd Schema Challenge longdoc S (ON + PreCo + LitBank + 30k pseudo-singletons) Accuracy 59.4 #59 of 82 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections