Papers › On Generalization in Coreference Resolution
On Generalization in Coreference Resolution
Shubham Toshniwal, Patrick Xia, Sam Wiseman, Karen Livescu, Kevin Gimpel
While coreference resolution is defined independently of dataset domain, most models for performing coreference resolution do not transfer well to unseen domains. We consolidate a set of 8 coreference resolution datasets targeting different domains to evaluate the off-the-shelf performance of models. We then mix three datasets for training; even though their domain, annotation guidelines, and metadata differ, we propose a method for jointly training a single model on this heterogeneous data mixture by using data augmentation to account for annotation differences and sampling to balance the data quantities. We find that in a zero-shot setting, models trained on a single dataset transfer poorly while joint training yields improved overall performance, leading to better generalization in coreference resolution models. This work contributes a new benchmark for robust coreference resolution and multiple new state-of-the-art results.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coreference Resolution | LitBank | longdoc S (OntoNotes + PreCo + LitBank) | F1 | 78.2 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Coreference Resolution | OntoNotes | longdoc S (OntoNotes + 60k pseudo-singletons) | F1 | 80.6 | #8 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Coreference Resolution | OntoNotes | longdoc S (ON + PreCo + LitBank + 30k pseudo-singletons) | F1 | 79.6 | #13 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Coreference Resolution | OntoNotes | longdoc S (OntoNotes + PreCo + LitBank) | F1 | 79.2 | #14 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Coreference Resolution | PreCo | longdoc S (OntoNotes + PreCo + LitBank) | F1 | 87.6 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Coreference Resolution | Quizbowl | longdoc S (OntoNotes + PreCo + LitBank) | F1 | 42.9 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Coreference Resolution | WikiCoref | longdoc S (ON + PreCo + LitBank + 30k pseudo-singletons) | F1 | 62.5 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Coreference Resolution | WikiCoref | longdoc S (OntoNotes + PreCo + LitBank) | F1 | 60.3 | #3 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Coreference Resolution | Winograd Schema Challenge | longdoc S (OntoNotes + PreCo + LitBank) | Accuracy | 60.1 | #58 of 82 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Coreference Resolution | Winograd Schema Challenge | longdoc S (ON + PreCo + LitBank + 30k pseudo-singletons) | Accuracy | 59.4 | #59 of 82 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections