Papers › Next-ViT: Next Generation Vision Transformer for Efficient Deployment in Realistic...

Next-ViT: Next Generation Vision Transformer for Efficient Deployment in Realistic Industrial Scenarios

12 Jul 2022arXiv:2207.05501archive 2025-07-28

Jiashi Li, Xin Xia, Wei Li, Huixia Li, Xing Wang, Xuefeng Xiao, Rui Wang, Min Zheng, Xin Pan

Due to the complex attention mechanisms and model design, most existing vision Transformers (ViTs) can not perform as efficiently as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in realistic industrial deployment scenarios, e.g. TensorRT and CoreML. This poses a distinct challenge: Can a visual neural network be designed to infer as fast as CNNs and perform as powerful as ViTs? Recent works have tried to design CNN-Transformer hybrid architectures to address this issue, yet the overall performance of these works is far away from satisfactory. To end these, we propose a next generation vision Transformer for efficient deployment in realistic industrial scenarios, namely Next-ViT, which dominates both CNNs and ViTs from the perspective of latency/accuracy trade-off. In this work, the Next Convolution Block (NCB) and Next Transformer Block (NTB) are respectively developed to capture local and global information with deployment-friendly mechanisms. Then, Next Hybrid Strategy (NHS) is designed to stack NCB and NTB in an efficient hybrid paradigm, which boosts performance in various downstream tasks. Extensive experiments show that Next-ViT significantly outperforms existing CNNs, ViTs and CNN-Transformer hybrid architectures with respect to the latency/accuracy trade-off across various vision tasks. On TensorRT, Next-ViT surpasses ResNet by 5.5 mAP (from 40.4 to 45.9) on COCO detection and 7.7% mIoU (from 38.8% to 46.5%) on ADE20K segmentation under similar latency. Meanwhile, it achieves comparable performance with CSWin, while the inference speed is accelerated by 3.6x. On CoreML, Next-ViT surpasses EfficientFormer by 4.6 mAP (from 42.6 to 47.2) on COCO detection and 3.5% mIoU (from 45.1% to 48.6%) on ADE20K segmentation under similar latency. Our code and models are made public at: https://github.com/bytedance/Next-ViT

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2207.05501")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 2 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 2 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

bytedance/next-vit officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report
IMvision12/NextViT-tf mentioned on GitHubtf report
rwightman/pytorch-image-models mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
wilile26811249/Next-ViT mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

2 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2unverified

Licence: 0 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from bytedance/next-vit. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

build_dataset bytedance/next-vit/classification/datasets.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 2317eda6ad7d0b3b · report
build_transform bytedance/next-vit/classification/datasets.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3bc74137ab36aa79 · report

Tasks

Image Classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Classification ImageNet Next-ViT-L @384 GFLOPs 32 #296 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet Next-ViT-L @384 Number of params 57.8M #296 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet Next-ViT-L @384 Top 1 Accuracy 84.7% #296 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet Next-ViT-B GFLOPs 8.3 #456 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet Next-ViT-B Number of params 44.8M #456 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet Next-ViT-B Top 1 Accuracy 83.2% #456 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet Next-ViT-S GFLOPs 5.8 #530 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet Next-ViT-S Number of params 31.7M #530 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet Next-ViT-S Top 1 Accuracy 82.5% #530 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

1x1 ConvolutionAbsolute Position EncodingsAdamAttentionAverage PoolingBPEBatch NormalizationBottleneck Residual BlockConvolutionDense ConnectionsDropoutGlobal Average PoolingKaiming InitializationLabel SmoothingLayer NormalizationLinear LayerMax PoolingMulti-Head AttentionPosition-Wise Feed-Forward LayerReLUResidual BlockResidual ConnectionSPEEDSoftmaxTransformerVision Transformer

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections