Papers › Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units
Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units
Rico Sennrich, Barry Haddow, Alexandra Birch
Neural machine translation (NMT) models typically operate with a fixed vocabulary, but translation is an open-vocabulary problem. Previous work addresses the translation of out-of-vocabulary words by backing off to a dictionary. In this paper, we introduce a simpler and more effective approach, making the NMT model capable of open-vocabulary translation by encoding rare and unknown words as sequences of subword units. This is based on the intuition that various word classes are translatable via smaller units than words, for instance names (via character copying or transliteration), compounds (via compositional translation), and cognates and loanwords (via phonological and morphological transformations). We discuss the suitability of different word segmentation techniques, including simple character n-gram models and a segmentation based on the byte pair encoding compression algorithm, and empirically show that subword models improve over a back-off dictionary baseline for the WMT 15 translation tasks English-German and English-Russian by 1.1 and 1.3 BLEU, respectively.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1508.07909")
Code
Syntology Ran 21 of 30 code samples harvested from 7 repositories linked to this paper; 9 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 17 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 3 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 4 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran; community (archive-listed): 24 samples from 6 repositories, 17 ran; 2 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
26 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
30 samples harvested; 21 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 21 of the 30 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 7 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
6aafe96a739d0b09 · report
ab293eff6ffc4b69 · report
800b6a080cb3c624 · report
d86dc2151a1bd58e · report
33b1567b39f86e71 · report
70a8fed9225c5845 · report
2032a0c86da75680 · report
c837ac919bdfe91e · report
e27a7ada9b96b37e · report
afdbbe2995c004e2 · report
9425aef3e44f6979 · report
bc7574327ea1f634 · report
afac3ba7a001359e · report
a4985508aef2cb2a · report
029694838a73e5fc · report
72ccea7ec0eb1e6a · report
1c202c7e568439b5 · report
15d9c32bbe7da76f · report
d1027b3c5283677a · report
684c47713cee0e44 · report
c0d8d4efee4a4015 · report
293d3695d53b0cb1 · report
133f6dc75e90bbd6 · report
0c8c96b6d6bd911a · report
927c3c1d2631e415 · report
e2122ad711c160ec · report
c5fcb9cba4915130 · report
718aeb6813392ac3 · report
fe96394f96a9c638 · report
b83d785ca99bfc9f · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Machine Translation | WMT2015 English-German | BPE word segmentation | BLEU score | 22.8 | #4 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Machine Translation | WMT2015 English-Russian | C2-50k Segmentation | BLEU score | 20.9 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Introduced by this paper: BPE
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections