Papers › NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis
NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis
Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T. Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, Ren Ng
We present a method that achieves state-of-the-art results for synthesizing novel views of complex scenes by optimizing an underlying continuous volumetric scene function using a sparse set of input views. Our algorithm represents a scene using a fully-connected (non-convolutional) deep network, whose input is a single continuous 5D coordinate (spatial location (x,y,z) and viewing direction (θ, ϕ)) and whose output is the volume density and view-dependent emitted radiance at that spatial location. We synthesize views by querying 5D coordinates along camera rays and use classic volume rendering techniques to project the output colors and densities into an image. Because volume rendering is naturally differentiable, the only input required to optimize our representation is a set of images with known camera poses. We describe how to effectively optimize neural radiance fields to render photorealistic novel views of scenes with complicated geometry and appearance, and demonstrate results that outperform prior work on neural rendering and view synthesis. View synthesis results are best viewed as videos, so we urge readers to view our supplementary video for convincing comparisons.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2003.08934")
Code
Syntology Ran 40 of 56 code samples harvested from 10 repositories linked to this paper; 16 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · violated contract; 16 ran · our draft was wrong; 4 ran · fixture could not drive it; 18 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 12 samples from 1 repository, 5 ran; community (archive-listed): 41 samples from 9 repositories, 33 ran; 3 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
37 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
56 samples harvested; 40 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 16 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 4 of the 56 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 10 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
ce716d3807564106 · report
9a8470533015ce8b · report
1d6f8390d799f055 · report
9b2cb1a88d84aec6 · report
aa52acee18f54d38 · report
7ee442908cd304b1 · report
e69746042397f344 · report
969654a81252ebbd · report
5dfee35860e399af · report
36f5de7a0aae4a9b · report
b15bbbfd76c144e6 · report
bc8041fd2b31b089 · report
1a19fbfcebd5f31a · report
355a63e6de028c93 · report
6bb87af4d7775276 · report
0bc6c9ee0b5176e3 · report
9e4eb567d4c26168 · report
29bf7322a693d800 · report
9fa6773feb9a0f57 · report
924ec325aa22bca1 · report
5c0af089509a5195 · report
f5a79b19662b118c · report
2f76a86e3e1b1c50 · report
429e689dec4629ec · report
4c51a645589e581f · report
8974e4406c79c5bd · report
bde1f23d239dd9ad · report
97be931adba5c037 · report
6bf9156e8a423ebc · report
ede4a3a14cd0c5a7 · report
6781dae351c0e669 · report
0f7fe9f9700b5d37 · report
e880e929a516e218 · report
35565da1dac960eb · report
88f06f0c72b003cf · report
834db3a0c6566522 · report
dd6690a28620c0d8 · report
31e9359f618551ac · report
b7f46d0d6eb9f533 · report
76043c73feb0d5bc · report
c28b6ff0b012dc3a · report
7ecb7076c29cd0d3 · report
f5a330da29e2f8e9 · report
c3cd90a5ba1fb061 · report
b7bd14e91d2770c0 · report
4cf87da067a5c9b0 · report
3ef923fe3f562a7e · report
898a883c9cbd99f6 · report
61e92f9d263cddc9 · report
527832def209c604 · report
72ae52782cdecbe7 · report
b06ced583714627c · report
d0c2ad169481a881 · report
fd57e365830d09de · report
8f235fb889b93174 · report
b0ddc73a6106f3b5 · report
Tasks
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-Dose X-Ray Ct Reconstruction | X3D | NeRF | PSNR | 32.15 | #7 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Low-Dose X-Ray Ct Reconstruction | X3D | NeRF | SSIM | 0.9354 | #7 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Novel View Synthesis | X3D | NeRF | PSNR | 32.49 | #5 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Novel View Synthesis | X3D | NeRF | SSIM | 0.9770 | #5 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections