Papers › RankSeg: Adaptive Pixel Classification with Image Category Ranking for Segmentation

RankSeg: Adaptive Pixel Classification with Image Category Ranking for Segmentation

8 Mar 2022arXiv:2203.04187archive 2025-07-28

Haodi He, Yuhui Yuan, Xiangyu Yue, Han Hu

The segmentation task has traditionally been formulated as a complete-label pixel classification task to predict a class for each pixel from a fixed number of predefined semantic categories shared by all images or videos. Yet, following this formulation, standard architectures will inevitably encounter various challenges under more realistic settings where the scope of categories scales up (e.g., beyond the level of 1k). On the other hand, in a typical image or video, only a few categories, i.e., a small subset of the complete label are present. Motivated by this intuition, in this paper, we propose to decompose segmentation into two sub-problems: (i) image-level or video-level multi-label classification and (ii) pixel-level rank-adaptive selected-label classification. Given an input image or video, our framework first conducts multi-label classification over the complete label, then sorts the complete label and selects a small subset according to their class confidence scores. We then use a rank-adaptive pixel classifier to perform the pixel-wise classification over only the selected labels, which uses a set of rank-oriented learnable temperature parameters to adjust the pixel classifications scores. Our approach is conceptually general and can be used to improve various existing segmentation frameworks by simply using a lightweight multi-label classification head and rank-adaptive pixel classifier. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework with competitive experimental results across four tasks, including image semantic segmentation, image panoptic segmentation, video instance segmentation, and video semantic segmentation. Especially, with our RankSeg, Mask2Former gains +0.8%/+0.7%/+0.7% on ADE20K panoptic segmentation/YouTubeVIS 2019 video instance segmentation/VSPW video semantic segmentation benchmarks respectively.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections