Papers › Leveraging AI for Automatic Classification of PCOS Using Ultrasound Imaging
Leveraging AI for Automatic Classification of PCOS Using Ultrasound Imaging
Atharva Divekar, Atharva Sonawane
The AUTO-PCOS Classification Challenge seeks to advance the diagnostic capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) in identifying Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) through automated classification of healthy and unhealthy ultrasound frames. This report outlines our methodology for building a robust AI pipeline utilizing transfer learning with the InceptionV3 architecture to achieve high accuracy in binary classification. Preprocessing steps ensured the dataset was optimized for training, validation, and testing, while interpretability methods like LIME and saliency maps provided valuable insights into the model's decision-making. Our approach achieved an accuracy of 90.52%, with precision, recall, and F1-score metrics exceeding 90% on validation data, demonstrating its efficacy. The project underscores the transformative potential of AI in healthcare, particularly in addressing diagnostic challenges like PCOS. Key findings, challenges, and recommendations for future enhancements are discussed, highlighting the pathway for creating reliable, interpretable, and scalable AI-driven medical diagnostic tools.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Image Classification | PCOS Classification | InceptionV3 | 1:1 Accuracy | 90.2 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Medical Image Classification | PCOS Classification | EfficientNet B7 | 1:1 Accuracy | 88.9 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections