Papers › Learning Video Object Segmentation from Static Images
Learning Video Object Segmentation from Static Images
Anna Khoreva, Federico Perazzi, Rodrigo Benenson, Bernt Schiele, Alexander Sorkine-Hornung
Inspired by recent advances of deep learning in instance segmentation and object tracking, we introduce video object segmentation problem as a concept of guided instance segmentation. Our model proceeds on a per-frame basis, guided by the output of the previous frame towards the object of interest in the next frame. We demonstrate that highly accurate object segmentation in videos can be enabled by using a convnet trained with static images only. The key ingredient of our approach is a combination of offline and online learning strategies, where the former serves to produce a refined mask from the previous frame estimate and the latter allows to capture the appearance of the specific object instance. Our method can handle different types of input annotations: bounding boxes and segments, as well as incorporate multiple annotated frames, making the system suitable for diverse applications. We obtain competitive results on three different datasets, independently from the type of input annotation.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1612.02646")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 8 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 8 samples from 2 repositories, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
8 samples harvested; 3 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
fac5364e2f53c6db · report
b3b7c1c716f4ca66 · report
27504cbeb5811ea6 · report
04449ede31497a35 · report
c5ef366468627417 · report
d6f2082b3d061708 · report
77f6bd28fdfa4b9a · report
e2097a28f2129d9b · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation | DAVIS 2016 | MSK | F-measure (Decay) | 9.0 | #65 of 78 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation | DAVIS 2016 | MSK | F-measure (Mean) | 75.4 | #65 of 78 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation | DAVIS 2016 | MSK | F-measure (Recall) | 87.1 | #65 of 78 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation | DAVIS 2016 | MSK | J&F | 77.55 | #65 of 78 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation | DAVIS 2016 | MSK | Jaccard (Decay) | 8.9 | #65 of 78 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation | DAVIS 2016 | MSK | Jaccard (Mean) | 79.7 | #65 of 78 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation | DAVIS 2016 | MSK | Jaccard (Recall) | 93.1 | #65 of 78 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation | YouTube | MaskTrack | mIoU | 0.726 | #5 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections