Papers › Learning to Anticipate Egocentric Actions by Imagination
Learning to Anticipate Egocentric Actions by Imagination
Yu Wu, Linchao Zhu, Xiaohan Wang, Yi Yang, Fei Wu
Anticipating actions before they are executed is crucial for a wide range of practical applications, including autonomous driving and robotics. In this paper, we study the egocentric action anticipation task, which predicts future action seconds before it is performed for egocentric videos. Previous approaches focus on summarizing the observed content and directly predicting future action based on past observations. We believe it would benefit the action anticipation if we could mine some cues to compensate for the missing information of the unobserved frames. We then propose to decompose the action anticipation into a series of future feature predictions. We imagine how the visual feature changes in the near future and then predicts future action labels based on these imagined representations. Differently, our ImagineRNN is optimized in a contrastive learning way instead of feature regression. We utilize a proxy task to train the ImagineRNN, i.e., selecting the correct future states from distractors. We further improve ImagineRNN by residual anticipation, i.e., changing its target to predicting the feature difference of adjacent frames instead of the frame content. This promotes the network to focus on our target, i.e., the future action, as the difference between adjacent frame features is more important for forecasting the future. Extensive experiments on two large-scale egocentric action datasets validate the effectiveness of our method. Our method significantly outperforms previous methods on both the seen test set and the unseen test set of the EPIC Kitchens Action Anticipation Challenge.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Action Anticipation | EPIC-KITCHENS-55 (Seen test set (S1)) | ImagineRNN | Top 1 Accuracy - Act. | 14.66 | #3 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Anticipation | EPIC-KITCHENS-55 (Seen test set (S1)) | ImagineRNN | Top 1 Accuracy - Noun | 22.79 | #3 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Anticipation | EPIC-KITCHENS-55 (Seen test set (S1)) | ImagineRNN | Top 1 Accuracy - Verb | 35.44 | #3 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Anticipation | EPIC-KITCHENS-55 (Seen test set (S1)) | ImagineRNN | Top 5 Accuracy - Act. | 34.98 | #3 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Anticipation | EPIC-KITCHENS-55 (Seen test set (S1)) | ImagineRNN | Top 5 Accuracy - Noun | 52.09 | #3 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Anticipation | EPIC-KITCHENS-55 (Seen test set (S1)) | ImagineRNN | Top 5 Accuracy - Verb | 79.72 | #3 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Anticipation | EPIC-KITCHENS-55 (Unseen test set (S2) | ImagineRNN | Top 1 Accuracy - Act. | 9.25 | #3 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Anticipation | EPIC-KITCHENS-55 (Unseen test set (S2) | ImagineRNN | Top 1 Accuracy - Noun | 15.50 | #3 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Anticipation | EPIC-KITCHENS-55 (Unseen test set (S2) | ImagineRNN | Top 1 Accuracy - Verb | 29.33 | #3 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Anticipation | EPIC-KITCHENS-55 (Unseen test set (S2) | ImagineRNN | Top 5 Accuracy - Act. | 22.19 | #3 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Anticipation | EPIC-KITCHENS-55 (Unseen test set (S2) | ImagineRNN | Top 5 Accuracy - Noun | 35.78 | #3 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Anticipation | EPIC-KITCHENS-55 (Unseen test set (S2) | ImagineRNN | Top 5 Accuracy - Verb | 70.67 | #3 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections