Papers › Learning Bottleneck Concepts in Image Classification

Learning Bottleneck Concepts in Image Classification

20 Apr 2023CVPR 2023 1arXiv:2304.10131archive 2025-07-28

Bowen Wang, Liangzhi Li, Yuta Nakashima, Hajime Nagahara

Interpreting and explaining the behavior of deep neural networks is critical for many tasks. Explainable AI provides a way to address this challenge, mostly by providing per-pixel relevance to the decision. Yet, interpreting such explanations may require expert knowledge. Some recent attempts toward interpretability adopt a concept-based framework, giving a higher-level relationship between some concepts and model decisions. This paper proposes Bottleneck Concept Learner (BotCL), which represents an image solely by the presence/absence of concepts learned through training over the target task without explicit supervision over the concepts. It uses self-supervision and tailored regularizers so that learned concepts can be human-understandable. Using some image classification tasks as our testbed, we demonstrate BotCL's potential to rebuild neural networks for better interpretability. Code is available at https://github.com/wbw520/BotCL and a simple demo is available at https://botcl.liangzhili.com/.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2304.10131")

Code

Syntology Ran 5 of 7 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 4 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 7 samples from 1 repository, 5 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

wbw520/botcl officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

7 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
4ran
2unverified

Licence: 7 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from wbw520/botcl. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Aggregate wbw520/botcl/model/reconstruct/model_main.py official repository ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · ffd5f53fd212a9c4 · report
PositionEmbeddingLearned wbw520/botcl/model/reconstruct/model_main.py official repository ran · metamorphic tier: invariant fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 51e67fb8178896f2 · report
PositionEmbeddingSine wbw520/botcl/model/reconstruct/model_main.py official repository ran · metamorphic tier: invariant fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · ac35c5d9fb6e692c · report
ScouterAttention wbw520/botcl/model/reconstruct/model_main.py official repository ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 056d1bfd4100a453 · report
build_position_encoding wbw520/botcl/model/reconstruct/model_main.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 59886ab4f3558c49 · report
ConceptAutoencoder wbw520/botcl/model/reconstruct/model_main.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 7d857bbb3ae3ab22 · report
vis wbw520/botcl/model/reconstruct/model_main.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 5a4183f33d05632f · report

Tasks

ClassificationImage Classificationimage-classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections