Papers › Learning and Generalizing Polynomials in Simulation Metamodeling

Learning and Generalizing Polynomials in Simulation Metamodeling

20 Jul 2023arXiv:2307.10892archive 2025-07-28

Jesper Hauch, Christoffer Riis, Francisco C. Pereira

The ability to learn polynomials and generalize out-of-distribution is essential for simulation metamodels in many disciplines of engineering, where the time step updates are described by polynomials. While feed forward neural networks can fit any function, they cannot generalize out-of-distribution for higher-order polynomials. Therefore, this paper collects and proposes multiplicative neural network (MNN) architectures that are used as recursive building blocks for approximating higher-order polynomials. Our experiments show that MNNs are better than baseline models at generalizing, and their performance in validation is true to their performance in out-of-distribution tests. In addition to MNN architectures, a simulation metamodeling approach is proposed for simulations with polynomial time step updates. For these simulations, simulating a time interval can be performed in fewer steps by increasing the step size, which entails approximating higher-order polynomials. While our approach is compatible with any simulation with polynomial time step updates, a demonstration is shown for an epidemiology simulation model, which also shows the inductive bias in MNNs for learning and generalizing higher-order polynomials.

PaperPDFCode

Code

jesperhauch/polynomial_deep_learning officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

EpidemiologyInductive Bias

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections