Papers › Learning and Evaluating Representations for Deep One-class Classification
Learning and Evaluating Representations for Deep One-class Classification
Kihyuk Sohn, Chun-Liang Li, Jinsung Yoon, Minho Jin, Tomas Pfister
We present a two-stage framework for deep one-class classification. We first learn self-supervised representations from one-class data, and then build one-class classifiers on learned representations. The framework not only allows to learn better representations, but also permits building one-class classifiers that are faithful to the target task. We argue that classifiers inspired by the statistical perspective in generative or discriminative models are more effective than existing approaches, such as a normality score from a surrogate classifier. We thoroughly evaluate different self-supervised representation learning algorithms under the proposed framework for one-class classification. Moreover, we present a novel distribution-augmented contrastive learning that extends training distributions via data augmentation to obstruct the uniformity of contrastive representations. In experiments, we demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on visual domain one-class classification benchmarks, including novelty and anomaly detection. Finally, we present visual explanations, confirming that the decision-making process of deep one-class classifiers is intuitive to humans. The code is available at https://github.com/google-research/deep_representation_one_class.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | DisAug CLR | Detection AUROC | 86.5 | #118 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | DisAug CLR | Segmentation AUROC | 90.4 | #118 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | RotNet (MLP Head) | Detection AUROC | 86.3 | #119 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | RotNet (MLP Head) | Segmentation AUROC | 93 | #119 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | One-class CIFAR-10 | DisAug CLR | AUROC | 92.5 | #15 of 36 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | One-class CIFAR-100 | DisAug CLR | AUROC | 86.5 | #8 of 15 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | One-class CIFAR-100 | Rotation Prediction | AUROC | 84.1 | #10 of 15 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections