Papers › Interpretation of 3D CNNs for Brain MRI Data Classification

Interpretation of 3D CNNs for Brain MRI Data Classification

20 Jun 2020arXiv:2006.15969archive 2025-07-28

Maxim Kan, Ruslan Aliev, Anna Rudenko, Nikita Drobyshev, Nikita Petrashen, Ekaterina Kondrateva, Maxim Sharaev, Alexander Bernstein, Evgeny Burnaev

Deep learning shows high potential for many medical image analysis tasks. Neural networks can work with full-size data without extensive preprocessing and feature generation and, thus, information loss. Recent work has shown that the morphological difference in specific brain regions can be found on MRI with the means of Convolution Neural Networks (CNN). However, interpretation of the existing models is based on a region of interest and can not be extended to voxel-wise image interpretation on a whole image. In the current work, we consider the classification task on a large-scale open-source dataset of young healthy subjects -- an exploration of brain differences between men and women. In this paper, we extend the previous findings in gender differences from diffusion-tensor imaging on T1 brain MRI scans. We provide the voxel-wise 3D CNN interpretation comparing the results of three interpretation methods: Meaningful Perturbations, Grad CAM and Guided Backpropagation, and contribute with the open-source library.

PaperPDFCode

Code

maxs-kan/InterpretableNeuroDL officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ClassificationGeneral ClassificationMedical Image Analysis

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

CAMConvolution

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections