Papers › Intelligent Camera Selection Decisions for Target Tracking in a Camera Network
Intelligent Camera Selection Decisions for Target Tracking in a Camera Network
Anil Sharma, Saket Anand, Sanjit K. Kaul
Camera Selection Decisions (CSD) are highly useful for several applications in a multi-camera network. For example, CSD benefit multi-camera target tracking by reducing the number of candidate cameras to look for the target’s next location. The correct candidate cameras, decreases the number of false Re-ID queries as well as the computation time. Also, in multi-camera trajectory forecasting (MCTF) to predict where a person will re-appear in the camera network along with the transition time. These applications require a large amount of annotated data for training. In this paper, we use state-representation learning with a reinforcement learning based policy to effectively and efficiently make camera selection decisions. We further demonstrate that by using learned state representations, as opposed to hand-crafted state variables, we are able to achieve stateof-the-art results on camera selection, while reducing the training time for the RL policy. Along with this, we use a reward function that helps to reduce the amount of supervision in training the policy in a semi-supervised way. We report our results on four datasets: NLPR MCT, DukeMTMC, CityFlow, and WNMF dataset. We show that an RL policy reduces unnecessary Re-ID queries and therefore the false alarms, scales well to larger camera networks, and is target-agnostic.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections