Papers › Instance-aware Dynamic Prompt Tuning for Pre-trained Point Cloud Models
Instance-aware Dynamic Prompt Tuning for Pre-trained Point Cloud Models
Yaohua Zha, Jinpeng Wang, Tao Dai, Bin Chen, Zhi Wang, Shu-Tao Xia
Pre-trained point cloud models have found extensive applications in 3D understanding tasks like object classification and part segmentation. However, the prevailing strategy of full fine-tuning in downstream tasks leads to large per-task storage overhead for model parameters, which limits the efficiency when applying large-scale pre-trained models. Inspired by the recent success of visual prompt tuning (VPT), this paper attempts to explore prompt tuning on pre-trained point cloud models, to pursue an elegant balance between performance and parameter efficiency. We find while instance-agnostic static prompting, e.g. VPT, shows some efficacy in downstream transfer, it is vulnerable to the distribution diversity caused by various types of noises in real-world point cloud data. To conquer this limitation, we propose a novel Instance-aware Dynamic Prompt Tuning (IDPT) strategy for pre-trained point cloud models. The essence of IDPT is to develop a dynamic prompt generation module to perceive semantic prior features of each point cloud instance and generate adaptive prompt tokens to enhance the model's robustness. Notably, extensive experiments demonstrate that IDPT outperforms full fine-tuning in most tasks with a mere 7% of the trainable parameters, providing a promising solution to parameter-efficient learning for pre-trained point cloud models. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/zyh16143998882/ICCV23-IDPT}.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2304.07221")
Code
Syntology Ran 9 of 14 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 8 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 10 samples from 1 repository, 7 ran; community (archive-listed): 4 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
14 samples harvested; 9 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 14 of the 14 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
e50a82843946d9b4 · report
50a5714aab590a59 · report
f9673b64dec8e89c · report
c7b64faa053f3761 · report
cc1832f8e8b3aa69 · report
bb22f81886c8963d · report
ed4cd8f3b2b83784 · report
c87e47714f68fa7d · report
2ede111e17f38a68 · report
b653db8db6d0a32f · report
3310d0089f97cac4 · report
892fce57c8dde09f · report
804ab252335f0df6 · report
05089574e956e053 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D Point Cloud Classification | ModelNet40 | IDPT | Overall Accuracy | 94.4 | #15 of 111 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| 3D Point Cloud Classification | ScanObjectNN | IDPT | OBJ-BG (OA) | 93.12 | #35 of 77 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| 3D Point Cloud Classification | ScanObjectNN | IDPT | Overall Accuracy | 88.51 | #35 of 77 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Classification | ModelNet40 10-way (10-shot) | IDPT | Overall Accuracy | 92.8 | #12 of 31 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Classification | ModelNet40 10-way (20-shot) | IDPT | Overall Accuracy | 95.4 | #13 of 31 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Classification | ModelNet40 5-way (10-shot) | IDPT | Overall Accuracy | 97.3 | #9 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Classification | ModelNet40 5-way (20-shot) | IDPT | Overall Accuracy | 97.9 | #14 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections