Papers › Improving End-to-End Speech-to-Intent Classification with Reptile

Improving End-to-End Speech-to-Intent Classification with Reptile

5 Aug 2020arXiv:2008.01994archive 2025-07-28

Yusheng Tian, Philip John Gorinski

End-to-end spoken language understanding (SLU) systems have many advantages over conventional pipeline systems, but collecting in-domain speech data to train an end-to-end system is costly and time consuming. One question arises from this: how to train an end-to-end SLU with limited amounts of data? Many researchers have explored approaches that make use of other related data resources, typically by pre-training parts of the model on high-resource speech recognition. In this paper, we suggest improving the generalization performance of SLU models with a non-standard learning algorithm, Reptile. Though Reptile was originally proposed for model-agnostic meta learning, we argue that it can also be used to directly learn a target task and result in better generalization than conventional gradient descent. In this work, we employ Reptile to the task of end-to-end spoken intent classification. Experiments on four datasets of different languages and domains show improvement of intent prediction accuracy, both when Reptile is used alone and used in addition to pre-training.

PaperPDF

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ClassificationGeneral ClassificationIntent ClassificationMeta-LearningSpeech RecognitionSpoken Language Understandingintent-classificationspeech-recognition

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Spoken Language Understanding Fluent Speech Commands Reptile Accuracy (%) 99.2 #13 of 17 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections