Papers › Identifying Spurious Correlations for Robust Text Classification

Identifying Spurious Correlations for Robust Text Classification

6 Oct 2020Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2020arXiv:2010.02458archive 2025-07-28

Zhao Wang, Aron Culotta

The predictions of text classifiers are often driven by spurious correlations -- e.g., the term `Spielberg' correlates with positively reviewed movies, even though the term itself does not semantically convey a positive sentiment. In this paper, we propose a method to distinguish spurious and genuine correlations in text classification. We treat this as a supervised classification problem, using features derived from treatment effect estimators to distinguish spurious correlations from "genuine" ones. Due to the generic nature of these features and their small dimensionality, we find that the approach works well even with limited training examples, and that it is possible to transport the word classifier to new domains. Experiments on four datasets (sentiment classification and toxicity detection) suggest that using this approach to inform feature selection also leads to more robust classification, as measured by improved worst-case accuracy on the samples affected by spurious correlations.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

tapilab/emnlp-2020-spurious officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ClassificationGeneral ClassificationRobust classificationSentiment AnalysisSentiment ClassificationText Classificationfeature selectiontext-classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Feature Selection

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections