Papers › HumanBench: Towards General Human-centric Perception with Projector Assisted Pretraining
HumanBench: Towards General Human-centric Perception with Projector Assisted Pretraining
Shixiang Tang, Cheng Chen, Qingsong Xie, Meilin Chen, Yizhou Wang, Yuanzheng Ci, Lei Bai, Feng Zhu, Haiyang Yang, Li Yi, Rui Zhao, Wanli Ouyang
Human-centric perceptions include a variety of vision tasks, which have widespread industrial applications, including surveillance, autonomous driving, and the metaverse. It is desirable to have a general pretrain model for versatile human-centric downstream tasks. This paper forges ahead along this path from the aspects of both benchmark and pretraining methods. Specifically, we propose a \textbf{HumanBench} based on existing datasets to comprehensively evaluate on the common ground the generalization abilities of different pretraining methods on 19 datasets from 6 diverse downstream tasks, including person ReID, pose estimation, human parsing, pedestrian attribute recognition, pedestrian detection, and crowd counting. To learn both coarse-grained and fine-grained knowledge in human bodies, we further propose a \textbf{P}rojector \textbf{A}ssis\textbf{T}ed \textbf{H}ierarchical pretraining method (\textbf{PATH}) to learn diverse knowledge at different granularity levels. Comprehensive evaluations on HumanBench show that our PATH achieves new state-of-the-art results on 17 downstream datasets and on-par results on the other 2 datasets. The code will be publicly at \href{https://github.com/OpenGVLab/HumanBench}{https://github.com/OpenGVLab/HumanBench}.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2303.05675")
Code
Syntology Ran 15 of 25 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 10 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 4 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 9 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 25 samples from 1 repository, 15 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
25 samples harvested; 15 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 10 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 25 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from OpenGVLab/HumanBench. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
39af89396152713c · report
9af8e85813684a76 · report
69b9d45d322d1680 · report
68e7a844f6a217c9 · report
d32957ea95e1f955 · report
0973dbf09d2066c7 · report
8dc7dc2bedef1191 · report
a88ee7f6d338ad8d · report
dfb3581e62456ff2 · report
60a3f862716c1212 · report
87cadb13cda1c63e · report
37dc7bc4f8eea14d · report
c0b365b386a2ce5a · report
c577116b3b35c1c3 · report
e9cfd29d0d37ed43 · report
d2b8be1e94eca236 · report
344d0eb15f2cb514 · report
8e99c11a4e7efdd5 · report
c8bcf97bcffa2bfd · report
fc286c766c71de79 · report
839f42723dc179f9 · report
37c5cac4e0bae684 · report
5de1a5737d6af117 · report
f6675e1e59cce43a · report
9deeaa92c6fb18e5 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pedestrian Attribute Recognition | PA-100K | PATH (Partial FT) | Accuracy | 90.8 | #1 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Pose Estimation | COCO (Common Objects in Context) | PATH (Partial FT) | AP | 77.1 | #7 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections