Papers › High-Resolution Representations for Labeling Pixels and Regions
High-Resolution Representations for Labeling Pixels and Regions
Ke Sun, Yang Zhao, Borui Jiang, Tianheng Cheng, Bin Xiao, Dong Liu, Yadong Mu, Xinggang Wang, Wenyu Liu, Jingdong Wang
High-resolution representation learning plays an essential role in many vision problems, e.g., pose estimation and semantic segmentation. The high-resolution network (HRNet)~\cite{SunXLW19}, recently developed for human pose estimation, maintains high-resolution representations through the whole process by connecting high-to-low resolution convolutions in \emph{parallel} and produces strong high-resolution representations by repeatedly conducting fusions across parallel convolutions. In this paper, we conduct a further study on high-resolution representations by introducing a simple yet effective modification and apply it to a wide range of vision tasks. We augment the high-resolution representation by aggregating the (upsampled) representations from all the parallel convolutions rather than only the representation from the high-resolution convolution as done in~\cite{SunXLW19}. This simple modification leads to stronger representations, evidenced by superior results. We show top results in semantic segmentation on Cityscapes, LIP, and PASCAL Context, and facial landmark detection on AFLW, COFW, $300$W, and WFLW. In addition, we build a multi-level representation from the high-resolution representation and apply it to the Faster R-CNN object detection framework and the extended frameworks. The proposed approach achieves superior results to existing single-model networks on COCO object detection. The code and models have been publicly available at \url{https://github.com/HRNet}.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1904.04514")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 18 code samples harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper; 15 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 14 samples from 4 repositories, 1 ran; 4 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
39 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
18 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 15 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 5 of the 18 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
fac5364e2f53c6db · report
c08e7121f699a983 · report
10bb6a2d70d61ca6 · report
aae07a37335e79dd · report
b674ceff022ebcc2 · report
6890565633b480b8 · report
7ae17b8a73133c4d · report
e23968c493407287 · report
d087e320591e6ba7 · report
32f45cf75891bd16 · report
98a265524b160e10 · report
cc83fb3836123035 · report
b50608a902a34b99 · report
5feabe579b35978a · report
451bcfd505206dce · report
bb37605b18846a6b · report
2534c81208f21998 · report
78015ae361e585ca · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Face Alignment | 300W | HR-Net | NME_inter-ocular (%, Challenge) | 5.15 | #24 of 48 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | 300W | HR-Net | NME_inter-ocular (%, Common) | 2.87 | #24 of 48 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | 300W | HR-Net | NME_inter-ocular (%, Full) | 3.32 | #24 of 48 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | AFLW-19 | HR-Net | NME_diag (%, Frontal) | 1.46 | #13 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | AFLW-19 | HR-Net | NME_diag (%, Full) | 1.57 | #13 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | COFW | HRNet | NME (inter-ocular) | 3.45% | #12 of 28 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | ADE20K | HRNetV2 | Validation mIoU | 43.2 | #210 of 235 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | ADE20K val | HRNetV2 (HRNetV2-W48) | mIoU | 42.99 | #92 of 95 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | Cityscapes test | HRNet (HRNetV2-W48) | Mean IoU (class) | 81.6% | #38 of 105 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | LIP val | HRNetV2 (HRNetV2-W48) | mIoU | 55.90% | #7 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections