Papers › High-Performance Large-Scale Image Recognition Without Normalization

High-Performance Large-Scale Image Recognition Without Normalization

11 Feb 2021arXiv:2102.06171archive 2025-07-28

Andrew Brock, Soham De, Samuel L. Smith, Karen Simonyan

Batch normalization is a key component of most image classification models, but it has many undesirable properties stemming from its dependence on the batch size and interactions between examples. Although recent work has succeeded in training deep ResNets without normalization layers, these models do not match the test accuracies of the best batch-normalized networks, and are often unstable for large learning rates or strong data augmentations. In this work, we develop an adaptive gradient clipping technique which overcomes these instabilities, and design a significantly improved class of Normalizer-Free ResNets. Our smaller models match the test accuracy of an EfficientNet-B7 on ImageNet while being up to 8.7x faster to train, and our largest models attain a new state-of-the-art top-1 accuracy of 86.5%. In addition, Normalizer-Free models attain significantly better performance than their batch-normalized counterparts when finetuning on ImageNet after large-scale pre-training on a dataset of 300 million labeled images, with our best models obtaining an accuracy of 89.2%. Our code is available at https://github.com/deepmind/ deepmind-research/tree/master/nfnets

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2102.06171")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · fixture could not drive it.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 3 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

20 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.

deepmind/deepmind-research officialmentioned in papertf report
ahsanmemon/NFNets-Tensorflow mentioned on GitHubtf report
ayulockin/Explore-NFNet mentioned on GitHubtf report
benjs/nfnets_pytorch mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
callmefish/NFnet mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
psh01087/simple-nfnet mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
rwightman/efficientdet-pytorch mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
rwightman/pytorch-image-models mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
sense-x/tokenmix mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
smilingwolf/sw-cv-modelzoo mentioned on GitHubtf report
vballoli/nfnets-pytorch mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
ypeleg/nfnets-keras mentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

3ran · fixture could not drive it

Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from callmefish/NFnet. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

reduce_fn callmefish/NFnet/utils.py community (archive-listed) ran · fixture could not drive it no licence file found · pointer only · 72ab490c68e07338 · report
softmax_cross_entropy callmefish/NFnet/utils.py community (archive-listed) ran · fixture could not drive it no licence file found · pointer only · 1f05ed2c304f566d · report
topk_correct callmefish/NFnet/utils.py community (archive-listed) ran · fixture could not drive it no licence file found · pointer only · 07d4886e953a2f31 · report

Tasks

Image ClassificationVocal Bursts Intensity Predictionimage-classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F4+ GFLOPs 367 #23 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F4+ Number of params 527M #23 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F4+ Top 1 Accuracy 89.2% #23 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F6 w/ SAM GFLOPs 377.28 #141 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F6 w/ SAM Number of params 438.4M #141 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F6 w/ SAM Top 1 Accuracy 86.5% #141 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F5 w/ SAM GFLOPs 289.76 #163 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F5 w/ SAM Number of params 377.2M #163 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F5 w/ SAM Top 1 Accuracy 86.3% #163 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F5 GFLOPs 289.76 #184 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F5 Number of params 377.2M #184 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F5 Top 1 Accuracy 86.0% #184 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F4 GFLOPs 215.24 #188 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F4 Number of params 316.1M #188 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F4 Top 1 Accuracy 85.9% #188 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F3 GFLOPs 114.76 #211 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F3 Number of params 254.9M #211 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F3 Top 1 Accuracy 85.7% #211 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F2 GFLOPs 62.59 #260 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F2 Number of params 193.8M #260 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F2 Top 1 Accuracy 85.1% #260 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F1 GFLOPs 35.54 #301 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F1 Number of params 132.6M #301 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F1 Top 1 Accuracy 84.7% #301 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F0 GFLOPs 12.38 #416 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F0 Number of params 71.5M #416 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NFNet-F0 Top 1 Accuracy 83.6% #416 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Gradient Clipping

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections