Papers › GeminiFusion: Efficient Pixel-wise Multimodal Fusion for Vision Transformer
GeminiFusion: Efficient Pixel-wise Multimodal Fusion for Vision Transformer
Ding Jia, Jianyuan Guo, Kai Han, Han Wu, Chao Zhang, Chang Xu, Xinghao Chen
Cross-modal transformers have demonstrated superiority in various vision tasks by effectively integrating different modalities. This paper first critiques prior token exchange methods which replace less informative tokens with inter-modal features, and demonstrate exchange based methods underperform cross-attention mechanisms, while the computational demand of the latter inevitably restricts its use with longer sequences. To surmount the computational challenges, we propose GeminiFusion, a pixel-wise fusion approach that capitalizes on aligned cross-modal representations. GeminiFusion elegantly combines intra-modal and inter-modal attentions, dynamically integrating complementary information across modalities. We employ a layer-adaptive noise to adaptively control their interplay on a per-layer basis, thereby achieving a harmonized fusion process. Notably, GeminiFusion maintains linear complexity with respect to the number of input tokens, ensuring this multimodal framework operates with efficiency comparable to unimodal networks. Comprehensive evaluations across multimodal image-to-image translation, 3D object detection and arbitrary-modal semantic segmentation tasks, including RGB, depth, LiDAR, event data, etc. demonstrate the superior performance of our GeminiFusion against leading-edge techniques. The PyTorch code is available at https://github.com/JiaDingCN/GeminiFusion
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2406.01210")
Code
Syntology Ran 7 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 5 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 10 samples from 1 repository, 7 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
10 samples harvested; 7 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from JiaDingCN/GeminiFusion. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
144d10b49baeb8a6 · report
b8aa506cdb9aa1f4 · report
0cde8e101baaac37 · report
6b642fcee761770c · report
eea45a75f069aff9 · report
d9f8697f8d4a3b0f · report
61bf152e6a42a184 · report
19d28354dedaaeba · report
ddc545386a46bb98 · report
25f4c1d795867ecb · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semantic Segmentation | DELIVER | GeminiFusion | mIoU | 66.9 | #2 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | DeLiVER | GeminiFusion | mIoU | 66.9 | #3 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | NYU Depth v2 | GeminiFusion (Swin-Large) | Mean IoU | 60.9 | #4 of 121 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | NYU Depth v2 | GeminiFusion (Swin-Large) | Mean IoU | 60.2 | #6 of 121 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | NYU Depth v2 | GeminiFusion (MiT-B5) | Mean IoU | 57.7 | #14 of 121 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | NYU Depth v2 | GeminiFusion (MiT-B3) | Mean IoU | 56.8 | #20 of 121 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | SUN-RGBD | GeminiFusion (Swin-Large) | Mean IoU | 54.6 | #1 of 44 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | SUN-RGBD | GeminiFusion (MiT-B5) | Mean IoU | 53.3 | #4 of 44 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | SUN-RGBD | GeminiFusion (MiT-B3) | Mean IoU | 52.7 | #9 of 44 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections