Papers › Fully Convolutional Networks for Panoptic Segmentation
Fully Convolutional Networks for Panoptic Segmentation
1 Dec 2020CVPR 2021 1arXiv:2012.00720archive 2025-07-28
Yanwei Li, Hengshuang Zhao, Xiaojuan Qi, LiWei Wang, Zeming Li, Jian Sun, Jiaya Jia
In this paper, we present a conceptually simple, strong, and efficient framework for panoptic segmentation, called Panoptic FCN. Our approach aims to represent and predict foreground things and background stuff in a unified fully convolutional pipeline. In particular, Panoptic FCN encodes each object instance or stuff category into a specific kernel weight with the proposed kernel generator and produces the prediction by convolving the high-resolution feature directly. With this approach, instance-aware and semantically consistent properties for things and stuff can be respectively satisfied in a simple generate-kernel-then-segment workflow. Without extra boxes for localization or instance separation, the proposed approach outperforms previous box-based and -free models with high efficiency on COCO, Cityscapes, and Mapillary Vistas datasets with single scale input. Our code is made publicly available at https://github.com/Jia-Research-Lab/PanopticFCN.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-50-FPN) |
PQ |
44.3 |
#26 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-50-FPN) |
PQst |
35.6 |
#26 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-50-FPN) |
PQth |
50 |
#26 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-50-FPN) |
RQ |
53 |
#26 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-50-FPN) |
RQst |
43.5 |
#26 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-50-FPN) |
RQth |
59.3 |
#26 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-50-FPN) |
SQ |
80.7 |
#26 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-50-FPN) |
SQst |
76.7 |
#26 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-50-FPN) |
SQth |
83.4 |
#26 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale) |
PQth |
58.5 |
#31 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale) |
RQ |
61.6 |
#31 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale) |
RQst |
51.1 |
#31 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale) |
RQth |
68.6 |
#31 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale) |
SQ |
83.2 |
#31 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale) |
SQst |
81.1 |
#31 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO minival |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale) |
SQth |
84.6 |
#31 of 31 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO test-dev |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L) |
PQ |
52.7 |
#10 of 38 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO test-dev |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L) |
PQth |
59.4 |
#10 of 38 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO test-dev |
Panoptic FCN*++ (DCN-101-FPN) |
PQ |
47.5 |
#21 of 38 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO test-dev |
Panoptic FCN*++ (DCN-101-FPN) |
PQst |
38.2 |
#21 of 38 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
COCO test-dev |
Panoptic FCN*++ (DCN-101-FPN) |
PQth |
53.7 |
#21 of 38 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
Cityscapes val |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-FPN) |
PQ |
61.4 |
#23 of 37 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
Cityscapes val |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-FPN) |
PQth |
54.8 |
#23 of 37 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
Cityscapes val |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, Cityscapes-fine) |
PQst |
70.6 |
#35 of 37 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
Cityscapes val |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, Cityscapes-fine) |
PQth |
59.5 |
#35 of 37 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
Cityscapes val |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-50-FPN) |
PQst |
66.6 |
#36 of 37 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
Mapillary val |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale) |
PQ |
45.7 |
#3 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
Mapillary val |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale) |
PQst |
52.1 |
#3 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
Mapillary val |
Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale) |
PQth |
40.8 |
#3 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
Mapillary val |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-FPN) |
PQ |
36.9 |
#10 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
Mapillary val |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-FPN) |
PQth |
32.9 |
#10 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Panoptic Segmentation |
Mapillary val |
Panoptic FCN* (ResNet-50-FPN) |
PQst |
42.3 |
#13 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections