Papers › Explaining a Neural Attention Model for Aspect-Based Sentiment Classification Using...

Explaining a Neural Attention Model for Aspect-Based Sentiment Classification Using Diagnostic Classification

29 Mar 2021arXiv:2103.15927archive 2025-07-28

Lisa Meijer, Flavius Frasincar, Maria Mihaela Trusca

Many high performance machine learning models for Aspect-Based Sentiment Classification (ABSC) produce black box models, and therefore barely explain how they classify a certain sentiment value towards an aspect. In this paper, we propose explanation models, that inspect the internal dynamics of a state-of-the-art neural attention model, the LCR-Rot-hop, by using a technique called Diagnostic Classification. Our diagnostic classifier is a simple neural network, which evaluates whether the internal layers of the LCR-Rot-hop model encode useful word information for classification, i.e., the part of speech, the sentiment value, the presence of aspect relation, and the aspect-related sentiment value of words. We conclude that the lower layers in the LCR-Rot-hop model encode the part of speech and the sentiment value, whereas the higher layers represent the presence of a relation with the aspect and the aspect-related sentiment value of words.

PaperPDFCode

Code

lhmeijer/ABSCEM officialmentioned in papertf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ClassificationDiagnosticGeneral ClassificationSentiment AnalysisSentiment Classification

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections