Papers › EvolveGCN: Evolving Graph Convolutional Networks for Dynamic Graphs
EvolveGCN: Evolving Graph Convolutional Networks for Dynamic Graphs
Aldo Pareja, Giacomo Domeniconi, Jie Chen, Tengfei Ma, Toyotaro Suzumura, Hiroki Kanezashi, Tim Kaler, Tao B. Schardl, Charles E. Leiserson
Graph representation learning resurges as a trending research subject owing to the widespread use of deep learning for Euclidean data, which inspire various creative designs of neural networks in the non-Euclidean domain, particularly graphs. With the success of these graph neural networks (GNN) in the static setting, we approach further practical scenarios where the graph dynamically evolves. Existing approaches typically resort to node embeddings and use a recurrent neural network (RNN, broadly speaking) to regulate the embeddings and learn the temporal dynamics. These methods require the knowledge of a node in the full time span (including both training and testing) and are less applicable to the frequent change of the node set. In some extreme scenarios, the node sets at different time steps may completely differ. To resolve this challenge, we propose EvolveGCN, which adapts the graph convolutional network (GCN) model along the temporal dimension without resorting to node embeddings. The proposed approach captures the dynamism of the graph sequence through using an RNN to evolve the GCN parameters. Two architectures are considered for the parameter evolution. We evaluate the proposed approach on tasks including link prediction, edge classification, and node classification. The experimental results indicate a generally higher performance of EvolveGCN compared with related approaches. The code is available at \url{https://github.com/IBM/EvolveGCN}.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1902.10191")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 11 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 2 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: official repository: 2 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran; community (archive-listed): 9 samples from 2 repositories, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
11 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 1 of the 11 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
6051eda3143259d8 · report
959527ac6d4c891a · report
654acacaf00954fb · report
23fba400cff6fafa · report
098bba50be16f947 · report
38a5b951b572ace3 · report
0544ac6dc2820f74 · report
3b7db58dd36b10ee · report
2eb9d39c82188679 · report
672c2bffc50d20fd · report
275c19411fe5d6c0 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Link Prediction | DBLP Temporal | EGCN-H | AP | 83.87 | #5 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Dynamic Link Prediction | DBLP Temporal | EGCN-H | AUC | 80.80 | #5 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Dynamic Link Prediction | DBLP Temporal | EGCN-O | AP | 81.43 | #6 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Dynamic Link Prediction | DBLP Temporal | EGCN-O | AUC | 78.63 | #6 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Dynamic Link Prediction | Enron Emails | EGCN-H | AP | 88.29 | #5 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Dynamic Link Prediction | Enron Emails | EGCN-H | AUC | 89.33 | #5 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Dynamic Link Prediction | Enron Emails | EGCN-O | AP | 84.28 | #7 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Dynamic Link Prediction | Enron Emails | EGCN-O | AUC | 86.55 | #7 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections