Papers › EvolveGCN: Evolving Graph Convolutional Networks for Dynamic Graphs

EvolveGCN: Evolving Graph Convolutional Networks for Dynamic Graphs

26 Feb 2019arXiv:1902.10191archive 2025-07-28

Aldo Pareja, Giacomo Domeniconi, Jie Chen, Tengfei Ma, Toyotaro Suzumura, Hiroki Kanezashi, Tim Kaler, Tao B. Schardl, Charles E. Leiserson

Graph representation learning resurges as a trending research subject owing to the widespread use of deep learning for Euclidean data, which inspire various creative designs of neural networks in the non-Euclidean domain, particularly graphs. With the success of these graph neural networks (GNN) in the static setting, we approach further practical scenarios where the graph dynamically evolves. Existing approaches typically resort to node embeddings and use a recurrent neural network (RNN, broadly speaking) to regulate the embeddings and learn the temporal dynamics. These methods require the knowledge of a node in the full time span (including both training and testing) and are less applicable to the frequent change of the node set. In some extreme scenarios, the node sets at different time steps may completely differ. To resolve this challenge, we propose EvolveGCN, which adapts the graph convolutional network (GCN) model along the temporal dimension without resorting to node embeddings. The proposed approach captures the dynamism of the graph sequence through using an RNN to evolve the GCN parameters. Two architectures are considered for the parameter evolution. We evaluate the proposed approach on tasks including link prediction, edge classification, and node classification. The experimental results indicate a generally higher performance of EvolveGCN compared with related approaches. The code is available at \url{https://github.com/IBM/EvolveGCN}.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1902.10191")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 11 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 2 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 2 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran; community (archive-listed): 9 samples from 2 repositories, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

IBM/AMLSim officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubApache-2.0 report
IBM/EvolveGCN officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
Rufaim/EvolveGCN mentioned on GitHubtfMIT report
ansonb/deft mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
marlin-codes/HTGN mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
njuhtc/LEDG mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
sunnan191/evisec mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
tonyPo/AMLSim_prep mentioned on GitHubtfGPL-3.0 report
dmlc/dgl pytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · violated contract
2ran · our draft was wrong
8unverified

Licence: 1 of the 11 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

random_param_value IBM/EvolveGCN/run_exp.py official repository ran · violated contract fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 6051eda3143259d8 · report
build_random_hyper_params IBM/EvolveGCN/run_exp.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 959527ac6d4c891a · report
scaled_exp sunnan191/evisec/graph_transformer_layer.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 654acacaf00954fb · report
src_dot_dst sunnan191/evisec/graph_transformer_layer.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 23fba400cff6fafa · report
build_random_hyper_params njuhtc/LEDG/run_exp.py community (archive-listed) unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 098bba50be16f947 · report
compute_aupr sunnan191/evisec/detector.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 38a5b951b572ace3 · report
compute_auroc sunnan191/evisec/detector.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 0544ac6dc2820f74 · report
compute_fpr95 sunnan191/evisec/detector.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 3b7db58dd36b10ee · report
feature_reader sunnan191/evisec/models.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 2eb9d39c82188679 · report
graph_reader sunnan191/evisec/models.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 672c2bffc50d20fd · report
target_reader sunnan191/evisec/models.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 275c19411fe5d6c0 · report

Tasks

Dynamic Link PredictionEdge ClassificationGeneral ClassificationGraph Representation LearningLink PredictionNode ClassificationRepresentation Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Dynamic Link Prediction DBLP Temporal EGCN-H AP 83.87 #5 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Dynamic Link Prediction DBLP Temporal EGCN-H AUC 80.80 #5 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Dynamic Link Prediction DBLP Temporal EGCN-O AP 81.43 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Dynamic Link Prediction DBLP Temporal EGCN-O AUC 78.63 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Dynamic Link Prediction Enron Emails EGCN-H AP 88.29 #5 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Dynamic Link Prediction Enron Emails EGCN-H AUC 89.33 #5 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Dynamic Link Prediction Enron Emails EGCN-O AP 84.28 #7 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Dynamic Link Prediction Enron Emails EGCN-O AUC 86.55 #7 of 7 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

GCN

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections