Papers › Estimated Audio-Caption Correspondences Improve Language-Based Audio Retrieval
Estimated Audio-Caption Correspondences Improve Language-Based Audio Retrieval
Paul Primus, Florian Schmid, Gerhard Widmer
Dual-encoder-based audio retrieval systems are commonly optimized with contrastive learning on a set of matching and mismatching audio-caption pairs. This leads to a shared embedding space in which corresponding items from the two modalities end up close together. Since audio-caption datasets typically only contain matching pairs of recordings and descriptions, it has become common practice to create mismatching pairs by pairing the audio with a caption randomly drawn from the dataset. This is not ideal because the randomly sampled caption could, just by chance, partly or entirely describe the audio recording. However, correspondence information for all possible pairs is costly to annotate and thus typically unavailable; we, therefore, suggest substituting it with estimated correspondences. To this end, we propose a two-staged training procedure in which multiple retrieval models are first trained as usual, i.e., without estimated correspondences. In the second stage, the audio-caption correspondences predicted by these models then serve as prediction targets. We evaluate our method on the ClothoV2 and the AudioCaps benchmark and show that it improves retrieval performance, even in a restricting self-distillation setting where a single model generates and then learns from the estimated correspondences. We further show that our method outperforms the current state of the art by 1.6 pp. mAP@10 on the ClothoV2 benchmark.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Text to Audio Retrieval | Clotho | PaSST-RoBERTa & Estimated Audio–Caption Correspondences | R@1 | 27.69 | #1 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text to Audio Retrieval | Clotho | PaSST-RoBERTa & Estimated Audio–Caption Correspondences | R@10 | 70.39 | #1 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text to Audio Retrieval | Clotho | PaSST-RoBERTa & Estimated Audio–Caption Correspondences | R@5 | 57.03 | #1 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text to Audio Retrieval | Clotho | PaSST-RoBERTa & Estimated Audio–Caption Correspondences | mAP@10 | 40.14 | #1 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections