Papers › Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security

Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security

14 Jan 2022arXiv:2201.05574archive 2025-07-28

Yulin Liu, Yuxuan Lu, Kartik Nayak, Fan Zhang, Luyao Zhang, Yinhong Zhao

A transaction fee mechanism (TFM) is an essential component of a blockchain protocol. However, a systematic evaluation of the real-world impact of TFMs is still absent. Using rich data from the Ethereum blockchain, the mempool, and exchanges, we study the effect of EIP-1559, one of the earliest-deployed TFMs that depart from the traditional first-price auction paradigm. We conduct a rigorous and comprehensive empirical study to examine its causal effect on blockchain transaction fee dynamics, transaction waiting times, and consensus security. Our results show that EIP-1559 improves the user experience by mitigating intrablock differences in the gas price paid and reducing users' waiting times. However, EIP-1559 has only a small effect on gas fee levels and consensus security. In addition, we find that when Ether's price is more volatile, the waiting time is significantly higher. We also verify that a larger block size increases the presence of siblings. These findings suggest new directions for improving TFMs.

PaperPDFCode

Code

SciEcon/EIP1559 officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report
decensyslab/eip-1559-empirical-study officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

Replication Data for: "Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security"

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections