Datasets › Replication Data for: "Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security"
Replication Data for: "Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security"
Transaction fee mechanism (TFM) is an essential component of a blockchain protocol. However, a systematic evaluation of the real-world impact of TFMs is still absent. Using rich data from the Ethereum blockchain, mempool, and exchanges, we study the effect of EIP-1559, one of the first deployed TFMs that depart from the traditional first-price auction paradigm. We conduct a rigorous and comprehensive empirical study to examine its causal effect on blockchain transaction fee dynamics, transaction waiting time and security. Our results show that EIP-1559 improves the user experience by making fee estimation easier, mitigating intra-block difference of gas price paid, and reducing users' waiting times. However, EIP-1559 has only a small effect on gas fee levels and consensus security. In addition, we found that when Ether's price is more volatile, the waiting time is significantly higher. We also verify that a larger block size increases the presence of siblings. These findings suggest new directions for improving TFM.
Paper on arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.05574 Code and Script on GitHub: https://github.com/SciEcon/EIP1559
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard in the archive resolves to this dataset.
Papers archive 2025-07-28
No paper in the archive has a leaderboard row on this dataset; the archive counts 2 papers for it but never published that list.
Dataset loaders archive 2025-07-28
No loader listed in the archive.
Tasks archive 2025-07-28
No task tagged in the archive.
License archive 2025-07-28
CC BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Modalities archive 2025-07-28
Languages archive 2025-07-28
Variants archive 2025-07-28
- Replication Data for: "Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security"
1 variant name, as the archive lists them.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections